I've seen more than one Company where the Board members were pushing for one of the possible alternatives.Its a complicated situation, but the third party bid was always prefered by the Board for whatever reason
I've seen more than one Company where the Board members were pushing for one of the possible alternatives.
But the reasons for their preference were invariably the same.
I know nothing about their "whatever reasons" in this case, but I would bet that they aren't different from the others I've seen so far...
Yup, dead right, though to be fair to them they might be thinking about a lot of ordinary jobs in Portsmouth UK, rather than just their own jobs.
to be fair to them they might be thinking about a lot of ordinary jobs in Portsmouth UK, rather than just their own jobs.
I think that's correct.
Anyway, excellent news the deal is done:
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/...rket-news-detail.html?announcementId=10493836
FLIR will be good for Raymarine, they're in it for the long term. Not as good as staying in British ownership but far better than letting Garmin kill off a UK competitor in all but name.
Thanks for info. Sounds a good deal. I wouldn't worry about the UK-ownership thing, it's a bit illusory anyway.
Gone into adminitration see,
http://www.pbo.co.uk/news/462164/raymarine-plc-in-administration-shares-suspended
Brian
I think that's correct.
Anyway, excellent news the deal is done:
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/...rket-news-detail.html?announcementId=10493836
FLIR will be good for Raymarine, they're in it for the long term. Not as good as staying in British ownership but far better than letting Garmin kill off a UK competitor in all but name.
Was this comment of yours aimed at winning the "most interesting contribution of the week" context?Raymarine are dogmeat.
Raymarine are dogmeat. It's not as if they were the only vendors in town