mjcoon
Well-Known Member
Nothing to do with forcible rescue (so far as I know) but next week's programme, according to Radio Times, has a segment on a "domestic" between Mr & Mrs Yottie...
Mike.
Mike.
Nothing to do with forcible rescue (so far as I know) but next week's programme, according to Radio Times, has a segment on a "domestic" between Mr & Mrs Yottie...
Mike.
I think a number of the watchers who have posted missed a subtle but importaany nuance, and is relevant to a post earlier.
The RNLI cannot forcibly rescue, but the coast guard apparently CAN authorise a forcible rescue, presumably on grounds of public safety and risk to other maritime users.
If you watch the programme carefully you will see the lifeboat crew requested guidance from coastguard and coastguard authorised the rescue.
Which was the point made in post #5, now expanded upon by Channel Yacht. However, in the SL@S instance there was no authorised rescue and the LB cox took it upon himself to insist the man entered the lifeboat, in the full knowledge that he had no legal power to do so. And good on him for doing so.
The dinghy was just bobbing around with the sails aimlessly flapping
To be fair, he had a yacht with him and an RNLI boat. Perhaps he didn't feel he could just sail off. I don't think you can take footage showing him not sailing as proof he can't sail. He'd sailed himself out of the harbour and 4 miles once he was out, after all.
I’m not intending to criticise the sailor here, but from the footage it appeared he truly had no idea how to sail a dinghy
it was the yacht which called the CG to express concern for his safety, which in turn tasked the ILB to attend.
I guess my point here is simply that having seen the film; I thought the RNLI, the film-crew, the CG and the yacht all acted in a manner and took decisions which feel right with the benefit of hindsight - at least they do to me. I probably should have added AIMHO, or whatever that clever anacronym is!