westernman
Well-known member
It is much easier than you think to tie those things back to useful information.All optional though, and easy enough to stop. It's also harder than you think to tie those records back to useful information at that scale reliably.
There is a lot of very sophisticated big data algorithms sifting through huge amounts of data and working out the correlations.
Yes. That is because they already have all the data they need. They know exactly who was on the plane and who is coming into the country.Secure and accurate are not the same thing. Reliably matching a passport to a human doesn't improve border security.
Indeed, and we've all been through a Balearic (or similar) control where they barely even looked up to see if it was a passport. That's why I said the old system was more pragmatic, the new one doesn't really improve things it just adds theatre and deters the low end from trying. Have you thought about why it's important that you stay 90 days and not 91? As someone who can work remotely I've given it a great deal of thought and the system makes less sense than it first seems. It all boils down to tax, of course, as all things do.
90 days is common world wide. It is generous enough for most people and keeps people who are likely to become a burden or undesirable in some way out of the country. Those who want to stay longer, can easily apply for the visa to do so.