longjohnsilver
Well-Known Member
GJW are big , but reliable ?
Track down the article in this mag. about an incident on the Exe.
They refused to pay out, so big is not always good, nor small equals bad !
Which mag would that be?
GJW are big , but reliable ?
Track down the article in this mag. about an incident on the Exe.
They refused to pay out, so big is not always good, nor small equals bad !
GJW are big , but reliable ?
Track down the article in this mag. about an incident on the Exe.
They refused to pay out, so big is not always good, nor small equals bad !
Which mag would that be?
I know of at least two events on the Exe like that in the last five years.See post#18 which is the article I believe he was referring to. He has raised this before. The article was in either PBO or YM about 3 years ago.
It was a warning of the dangers of not insuring your boat against all risks. The poster seems to believe that insurers should pay out to third parties even when their insured is not responsible for the damage. Even though I have explained (as did the article) why this is not the case, he seems to have difficulty in accepting it.
Edward William will then go back to Insurers ...
Surprised by all the comments regarding the demands of insurance companies.
I have had marine insurance now for around 45 years, always with a variety of reputable UK based companies, St Mgts. Navigators, HNJ, Saga, etc. One claim for a mast back in 87. But in all that time I have never been asked to provide a survey of boat or rig, or to replace any part because of age. Perhaps they think that I might know what I am doing or have they just been careless?