East Fort Massac

This does seem a prime example of causing confusion for visitors. I'm sure most could understand 'Harwich Approach' as the slightly vague location for the site but I am puzzling over the benefit or justification for renaming it East Fort Massac... (or the approach to it...) does it appear on the charts, I don't have mine to hand.
Yes a stupid name. As you say what is wrong with Harwich approach. A name some one from Mars (with a suitable map/chart) could comprehend. Remember Consignia and Royal mail fiasco.
 
Assume that "Harwich Approach" is a v wide area given the length of the deep water channel... We have East and West Roughs buoys similarly which refer to their position relative to the danger they guard...
 
I have sailed in and out of Harwich at least once a year (often much more) every year since 1969, and if you had asked me where "East Fort Massac" was, I would not have had a clue, but I could have pointed you to the Cork, the Roughs, the Rolling Grounds, the Pitching Grounds, the Medusa, the Stone Banks and the Beach End without any hesitation! ;)
 
I have sailed in and out of Harwich at least once a year (often much more) every year since 1969, and if you had asked me where "East Fort Massac" was, I would not have had a clue, but I could have pointed you to the Cork, the Roughs, the Rolling Grounds, the Pitching Grounds, the Medusa, the Stone Banks and the Beach End without any hesitation! ;)
I agree - I would have preferred them to have chosen the Cork Sand Yacht Beacon rather than the East Fort Massac. Whatever, they choose, all I do is place the location into my plotter and make sure I don't hit it when heading up the East Coast!
 
Top