prv
Well-Known Member
Ariam's single-line reefing system is due an overhaul this winter. As part of that I want to replace the old 10mm polyester braid-on-braid with something a bit more high-tech. I would like to have thin, slippery, unobtrusive line for the part that lies against the sail when not reefed, and perhaps for most of the part inside the boom in order to reduce friction, but something big enough to grip at the cockpit end as I generally haul in the reef by hand before final tensioning on a winch. Plus of course I'd like to use the same clutches and winch as now.
Originally I was thinking of a thin dyneema line, spliced somehow onto a conventional polyester tail. However, this is asking a lot of the splice, which will be under load when the sail is reefed. So then I found out that you can buy line with a dyneema core and polyester cover, where the cover is designed to be removed for part of the length for exactly this sort of reason. So that's option two, provided that it's available in the right combination of sizes (as thin as possible for the required strength at one end, around 10mm at the other). Option three, I realised, was to stitch a length of dyneema onto the core of a polyester rope and pull it through so that the dyneema replaces the core - essentially making a rope like in option two. And I guess there's also (provided it doesn't slip in the clutches) a kind of option 3.5 where what I pull through is a complete core/cover rope, ending up with two covers for additional bulk.
I would also, if possible and I know it's a bit silly, like to colour the three reefs green, yellow, red in increasing order of scariness
. Some high-tech ropes seem to be available only in quite limited colours.
Given that my sailing was in bermudan rig before dyneema was known outside top-flight racing, then in square rig, then in gaff rig, and only now back to bermudan - I know little about dyneema and have never knowingly even held a piece of it. I'm also using "dyneema" as a collective term for all applicable high-tech fibres.
Advice from experienced workers with dyneema would be very welcome.
What diameter do I need for enough strength on the sail ends of the lines? 34-foot boat and I do want a respectable safety margin so I don't worry about the line snapping in high winds.
Do my plans two and / or three make sense?
What actual product names do I need to look for?
Cheers,
Pete
Originally I was thinking of a thin dyneema line, spliced somehow onto a conventional polyester tail. However, this is asking a lot of the splice, which will be under load when the sail is reefed. So then I found out that you can buy line with a dyneema core and polyester cover, where the cover is designed to be removed for part of the length for exactly this sort of reason. So that's option two, provided that it's available in the right combination of sizes (as thin as possible for the required strength at one end, around 10mm at the other). Option three, I realised, was to stitch a length of dyneema onto the core of a polyester rope and pull it through so that the dyneema replaces the core - essentially making a rope like in option two. And I guess there's also (provided it doesn't slip in the clutches) a kind of option 3.5 where what I pull through is a complete core/cover rope, ending up with two covers for additional bulk.
I would also, if possible and I know it's a bit silly, like to colour the three reefs green, yellow, red in increasing order of scariness
Given that my sailing was in bermudan rig before dyneema was known outside top-flight racing, then in square rig, then in gaff rig, and only now back to bermudan - I know little about dyneema and have never knowingly even held a piece of it. I'm also using "dyneema" as a collective term for all applicable high-tech fibres.
Advice from experienced workers with dyneema would be very welcome.
What diameter do I need for enough strength on the sail ends of the lines? 34-foot boat and I do want a respectable safety margin so I don't worry about the line snapping in high winds.
Do my plans two and / or three make sense?
What actual product names do I need to look for?
Cheers,
Pete