grumpy_o_g
Well-Known Member
Having read the report, that's a f*****g stitch up. £55k for the net assets of the old company which by the administrators value in excess of that and thats without any valuation of the goodwill (in the commercial sense) associated with the Dickies brand. So the administrators walk away with £44k, the Dickie family get their company back free and clear for a paltry £55k, the secured creditors get what they are owed and the non-secured creditors effectively pay for it all. I do wonder whether this is legally challengeable on the basis that an open sale would have achieved far more than £55k
I agree totally - I'd not only question the valuations though, the company has been trading at an increasing loss for three years - I would have thought that was wrongful trading under the insolvency act anyway surely? There's an almost throwaway line in the report to justify the director's behaviour "However, the Directors felt that the business had a good chance of returning to profit in the future due to signs that economic activity was improving". With losses of 3K in the year to Feb 2012, 150K to Feb 2012 and 350K to Feb 2013? And £190K in tax arrears? That's definitely taking the Michael. I wonder what remuneration the directors took over the previous 3 years whilst trading at a loss?