pkb
New member
Leafing through the August issue of YM I spotted an article where a yachtsman was asked to skipper a powerboat and vice versa for a power boat owner. All very interesting if a little predictable.
However, the yachtie was described as "traditional" - no furling genoa and no marinas etc - and it was reported that he liked to navigate "properly". This meant that he didn't use GPS.
I was baffled by this. The GPS for the modern sailor is a huge man-made navigational advance - maybe as significant as the invention of the 18th century Chronometer - so why ignore its advantages.
Maybe traditionalists of the 18th century preferred to ignore chronometers and navigate themselves "properly" on to shoals and reefs and into the hands of the scavengers who lived off wrecked ships.
Or am I having an improper thought.
Peter
However, the yachtie was described as "traditional" - no furling genoa and no marinas etc - and it was reported that he liked to navigate "properly". This meant that he didn't use GPS.
I was baffled by this. The GPS for the modern sailor is a huge man-made navigational advance - maybe as significant as the invention of the 18th century Chronometer - so why ignore its advantages.
Maybe traditionalists of the 18th century preferred to ignore chronometers and navigate themselves "properly" on to shoals and reefs and into the hands of the scavengers who lived off wrecked ships.
Or am I having an improper thought.
Peter