Damage from no anode ?

andrewhopkins

New member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
172
Location
West End, Surrey, UK
Visit site
We lifted our Bavaria 35 last week after a year in the water to get some slime off.

Upon doing this, we discovered that the man who had previously antifouled and also replaced the anode, had not screwed the anode to the hull and consequently the propellor had started to corode.

My understanding is that the next most vulnerable metal will deteriorate if the anode isnt working which seems to be the propellor.

Can I assume (or hope) that nothing else has corroded ? i.e. it would have to finish eating the propellor before "it " moved on to something else ?

Its a saildrive, Volvo MD2030
 

Piers

Well-known member
Joined
2 Jun 2001
Messages
3,595
Location
Guernsey, Channel Islands
www.playdeau.com
There is a great deal of damage that can occur - it just depends on your specific boat.

Might I suggest a chat with anode makers / specialists M G Duff, on 01243 533336, and try Chris Harris, the Sales Manager there. They are very helpful indeed, and sponsor the MBM Cruise Club.

Piers du Pré
MBM Cruising Club enthusiast
www.dupre.co.uk/fsPlaydeau.htm
 

PaulJ

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2001
Messages
695
Location
Ipswich
Visit site
Your propellor is probably brass or bronze, as are many through-hull fittings. You should check these very carefully which may not be easy. Clean them up so they are shiny metal, if there is any pinky tinge to the metal it means that they are becoming "dezincified" and they should be replaced.
 

brian_neale

New member
Joined
5 Jul 2001
Messages
123
Location
Winchester, UK
Visit site
Before I fitted an anode to my previous boat, the stainless steel bolts holding on the rudder suffered bad corrosion - even though there was a big bronze prop nearby! The problem was compounded by the fact that the corrosion was in the threads of the nuts and bolts and not visible on the surface, even though the nuts would have probably dropped off some time during the next season in the water. A point to check, anyway.
 

scottie

Well-known member
Joined
14 Nov 2001
Messages
5,469
Location
scotland
Visit site
the saildrive should have its own anode fitted in front of the propeller
this would be of more signifigance than the hull anode i would have thought
 

vyv_cox

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
25,899
Location
France, sailing Aegean Sea.
coxeng.co.uk
Corrosion of threads on stainless steel is due to crevice, not to galvanic corrosion. In this case there is a galvanic effect but it is due to differential aeration levels on the inside and outside of the threads. You could attach a zinc anode to stainless bolts and they would still corrode.

This is the reason that stainless fittings are not advocated beneath the hull, although it is quite unusual for rapid failure to take place.
 

JeremyF

New member
Joined
13 Jul 2001
Messages
782
Location
Solent
Visit site
I had a survey done recently on Westerly with a saildrive. As another poster has stated, the saildrive has its own anode. The hull was also fitted with an anode.

The prop was starting to be eaten, and the surveyor stated that the hull anode should be disconnected, leaving just the sail-drive one, because "anodes need to be worked hard to be efective"

Could you be in the same sitution?

Jeremy Flynn
 
G

Guest

Guest
That is not galvanic or electrolytic corrosion but crevice corrosion, If stainless steel is starved of oxygen then the oxide film which makes it rust-free breaks down and corrosion results, just as you say, where you cannot see it. Not a good material for underwater use!
 

brian_neale

New member
Joined
5 Jul 2001
Messages
123
Location
Winchester, UK
Visit site
I agree, guys - definitely crevice corrosion. That's why I suffered it for 4 years or so, replacing the bolts every year before any significant corrosion had happened. Then I fitted a hull anode, wired it to the bolts inside the hull, and they are still perfect after another 4 years. Makes no sense to me - do anodes have any significant placebo effect?

Whole point of the story in the first place was to suspect the unsuspected! Sure beats me.
 
Top