Correctly calibtating an electronic compass

Angele

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 Dec 2008
Messages
3,427
Location
Hertfordshire
Visit site
Galadriel's thread on his new compass got me thinking. As alluded to in one of my postings on that thread, there is significant error between my compass heading and the heading shown on my autohelm display. Not on every heading, but on some, and the extent of the error varies - the two agree which way is north, at least to within a degree or two but, when heading WSW for instance, they disagree by about 15 degrees.

Up to now, that hasn't really been a problem for me. I ensure that my crew are aware that the two compasses might read differently. If I ask someone to steer a course, they line it up on the compass and then, if they wish to read off the heading from the autopilot display (or, if they want to turn the autopilot on), I ask them to note what the display is actually showing and then they can steer to that.

The compass was swung by an adjuster and I have a deviation card in which the maximum error is tiny. I therefore believe this to be accurate. All of the nav instruments (depth, log and electronic compass) were calibrated by the agent who supplied the boat to me. I have since recalibrated the log as it was underreading, the depth is accurate, but I have not recalibrated the electronic compass - purely laziness on my part.

I cannot be sure that all of the dealer fit options I had supplied with the boat had been fitted at the time the calibration of the electronic compass was done. One of these items is an inverter, which is probably nearer to the fluxgate than would be ideal, but would be difficult to move. Also, since taking delivery of the boat, I have stuffed various things into lockers in and around the location of the fluxgate. Mostly these are non-metallic, but one or two (e.g. an extension lead) could be causing a deviation error.

I am aware that the fluxgate compass reading is used by my chartplotter to derive various data, such as true/apparent wind bearing (as opposed to relative to boat), implied tidal vector, etc. None of these is really that important and I can mentally adjust for them. However, my trip back across the channel at the weekend (overnight and in fog) has highlighted to me that this compass error is affecting my radar display (since I use it in N-up mode, overlaid on the chart) and the resultant MARPA readings. As this is a safety issue:eek:, I now accept that I really must sort it out.

So, I have resolved to recalibrate the electronic compass next time I am on the water. My understanding is that, to do so, you first of all point the boat north and then motor around slowly in circles, pressing various buttons as you go. Easy, peasy. However, before I do, one or two questions to knowledgeable forumites so that I can get a feel as to whether I can expect recalibration to be effective:

1. Is it possible that the cause of the error, which varies depending on the heading but is zero when pointing north, is down to poor calibration originally or is it more likely that it has been introduced subsequently by items placed near the compass, or is it impossible to tell?

2. If the answer to 1 is the former, what might have been the cause of the poor calibration (e.g. if the circle being steered whilst calibrating was not steady, which might have been the case if the bow was being blown off by a strong wind, would this have been likely to cause the problem)?

3. Does recalibration both reset due north and then remove deviation caused? Or, if something like the inverter is the cause of the deviation, is this impossible to correct purely from recalibration?

Your answers/comments/suggestions gratefully received.
 
The motoring in circles routine is a "linearisation" procedure, which I believe tries to even out deviation at different headings.

The actual calibration of the compass (ie setting North) is done manually in the plotter set-up. I find that fine-tuning using the radar/chart overlay works well.
 
How it works

The normal steering compass of a boat uses a pivoted magnet which swings to line itself up with the earth's magnetic field. Fluxgate compasses don't work that way; they have no moving parts. Instead, they have sensors which measure the strength of the field in two perpendicular directions.

Suppose that sensor A measures the field along the boat, and sensor B measures the field across the boat. Neglecting deviation for the moment, if the boat were facing north then sensor A would give a high reading (the full horizontal component of the earth's field) while sensor B would show zero. Gradually turn the boat, reading A decreases and B increases, until when the boat is facing east A shows zero and B has its maximum reading. By comparing the two readings we (or rather the software in the system) can work out the direction in which the boat is heading.

But if we know the earth's field strength in the two directions, then the system can work out the total field strength (another use for Pythagoras!). It shouldn't matter in which direction the boat is pointing, the field strength should stay the same. But if the boat is generating a magnetic field of its own, then as the boat is turned that field will sometimes be in the same direction as the earth's field, and at other times will be in the opposite direction. The result will be that as the boat is turned in a circle the apparent field will change. Boat's field helping earth's field, reading high; boat's field opposing earth's field, reading low. The cunning bit lies in using these variations to measure the boat's deviating field, and then to compensate for it. This is sometimes called 'linearisation'.

But although we've now got rid of the deviation caused by the boat's magnetism, we still don't know whether the fluxgate is pointing in the same direction as the boat. To do this we need to point the boat in a known direction, and then to adjust the fluxgate until its reading agrees with the known direction.

From the OP's number 1, it sounds as if his linearisation error is equal and opposite to his heading error when the boat is heading north. That's just luck. To correct the errors you must start with the linearisation procedure (usually pressing the right button sequence followed by two slow and steady circles) and then correct the heading adjustment. Doing the correction in the opposite order won't work.
 
Thanks you two. (I had to read PeterB's post a second time before I got it, but it makes a lot of sense).

From that, do you think that my compass may have been correctly calibrated initially (but subsequently affected by deviation from something fixed or stored nearby), or not done properly, or can't you tell?
 
Last edited:
Doesn't really matter, it's not a bad idea to go through the set-up every so often anyway. If you have a Raymarine plotter, the linearisation process is easy to follow and prompts you to align the compass heading at the appropriate time.
 
Doesn't really matter, it's not a bad idea to go through the set-up every so often anyway. If you have a Raymarine plotter, the linearisation process is easy to follow and prompts you to align the compass heading at the appropriate time.

You may be underestimating my ability to screw it up, but I'll give it a try! :o

I only hope I don't end up with a even worse result than I have a present!

Thanks again.
 
Peter

Thats is a good explanation. I have always wondered how 2 circles actually worked!


Angele

Although your magnetic compass has been corrected professionally there would be no harm in you checking it on a couple of headings. The simplest technique is to drive down a transit that is clear on the chart (posts and buildings being better than buoys that can move slightly). Then compare the ships heading with the chart (allowing for variation). The difference is your deviation and can be compared to the deviation card you have been supplied with.

Assuming all OK then you know 100% its the fluxgate that is out, without testing the magnetic compass it is possible you are barking up the wrong tree.
 
Some friends and I were once lent a steel boat for a couple of weeks in return for delivering it from one Spanish port to another.

It had a fluxgate compass of some sort, with a sensor mounted on the mast.

Our plan was to sail to the Balearics en-route to where we had to deliver the boat. Before leaving, our skipper decided to calibrate the compass, which involved motoring around in circles. All seemed ok and we set off for the islands.

After a few hours I had to go on deck, in the dark, to put a reef in. Whilst doing so I put my hand on the mast to steady myself and felt something move. It turned out to be the fluxgate sensor which had been fixed to the mast with gaffer tape!
 
Just one more comment: when you find a nice calm spot to do your circles in, try to avoid any area that might have iron (old wrecks?) or power cables. We once did the linearisation procedure in the Kiel Canal, at Rendsburg; we managed to put in 18 degrees of deviation, which we only spotted after leaving the canal at Cuxhaven.
 
Angele

Although your magnetic compass has been corrected professionally there would be no harm in you checking it on a couple of headings. The simplest technique is to drive down a transit that is clear on the chart (posts and buildings being better than buoys that can move slightly). Then compare the ships heading with the chart (allowing for variation). The difference is your deviation and can be compared to the deviation card you have been supplied with.

Assuming all OK then you know 100% its the fluxgate that is out, without testing the magnetic compass it is possible you are barking up the wrong tree.

I have used transits in the past and am confident that, on that limited set of data, the compass has always come good. But, what makes me absolutely sure it is the fluxgate that is out is the (marginally) erroneous results that the chartplotter produces - eg a radar overlay of the Solent that is the same as the chart shows, only rotated a few degrees, or a tide vector showing on the plotter whose direction changes according to the heading of the boat. These are clear proof that it is the fluxgate that is wrong.
 
Last edited:
Just one more comment: when you find a nice calm spot to do your circles in, try to avoid any area that might have iron (old wrecks?) or power cables. We once did the linearisation procedure in the Kiel Canal, at Rendsburg; we managed to put in 18 degrees of deviation, which we only spotted after leaving the canal at Cuxhaven.

As you can see from my post number 6, that is exactly the sort of thing I am worried about!
 
Hi Angele
I hope you are still around.
I have just fitted a chart plotter and my electronic compass now mis-reads by about 70 degrees and by differing amounts compared to the magnetic compass which I believe is accurate.
Can the electronic compass be reset?
 
Top