bozlite
Well-Known Member
Twohooter
First of all, I must say how much I'm enjoying this thread. My partner and I are planning (or dreaming about) something very similar - a leisurely tour around the coast of the UK (and perhaps further afield), and we too are drawn to Dutch steel cruisers. We've got one at the moment, in fact, but it's very definitely a river cruiser, not a coastal one. In our case, sadly, such dreams can't become reality for another 15 years or so ...
Anyway -
The hull designer Andrew Wolstenholme, writing in one of the boating magazines a year or so ago, pointed out that, although the 1.34 X SQRT calculation was fine for arriving at a maximum hull speed, the most efficient cruising speed was more likely to be around the SQRT of waterline length. I think he said that fuel consumption could double between SQRT and SQRT X 1.34.
Looking at that another way, though, that's about 50 hours of cruising! At least 5 days' worth, I'd have thought, if you're just hopping round the coast.
Stevens (built by the Smelne boatyard, I think) are very well-regarded. Our own boat is of completely unknown provenance, but I did rather fondly think that it had the look of a Stevens about it. I sent a photograph to them asking if I might by any chance be right and got a very polite, if firmly dismissive reply: "Dear Sir, Thank you for your email and photograph. Your boat is most definitely NOT a Stevens. Enjoy your boating."
First of all, I must say how much I'm enjoying this thread. My partner and I are planning (or dreaming about) something very similar - a leisurely tour around the coast of the UK (and perhaps further afield), and we too are drawn to Dutch steel cruisers. We've got one at the moment, in fact, but it's very definitely a river cruiser, not a coastal one. In our case, sadly, such dreams can't become reality for another 15 years or so ...
Anyway -
Therefore conventional hull speed = 1.34 X SQRT(36) = 8.04 say 8 knots. However I have been told to assume a hull speed of 6.5 knots. Haven't dug into that difference yet but my instinct is that the lower speed is likely to be correct.
The hull designer Andrew Wolstenholme, writing in one of the boating magazines a year or so ago, pointed out that, although the 1.34 X SQRT calculation was fine for arriving at a maximum hull speed, the most efficient cruising speed was more likely to be around the SQRT of waterline length. I think he said that fuel consumption could double between SQRT and SQRT X 1.34.
- Broker says that usual operation is at 6.5 knots on 1800 rpm. Engine is Perkins M150Ti and manufacturer's power/fuel consumption graph shows 13 litres/hour at this speed. Assume operation at my theoretical hull speed would increase relative fuel consumption, so stick with 13LPH
- Only one fuel tank, 705L.
- 705/13 = 54.2hrs x 6.5 = 352.3 nautical miles
- Allow 25% for unusable fuel and reserves, so 352.3/1.25 = 282 nautical miles
Looking at that another way, though, that's about 50 hours of cruising! At least 5 days' worth, I'd have thought, if you're just hopping round the coast.
Stevens (built by the Smelne boatyard, I think) are very well-regarded. Our own boat is of completely unknown provenance, but I did rather fondly think that it had the look of a Stevens about it. I sent a photograph to them asking if I might by any chance be right and got a very polite, if firmly dismissive reply: "Dear Sir, Thank you for your email and photograph. Your boat is most definitely NOT a Stevens. Enjoy your boating."
