£395 for a few resistors total value about £5 to frig with PWM signal.........Bargain!
yeah, but what about the copyright and intellectual property and all that carp for putting together this lot of resistors then? I recon they're worth a few hundred!£395 for a few resistors total value about £5 to frig with PWM signal.........Bargain!
£395 for a few resistors total value about £5 to frig with PWM signal.........Bargain!
yeah, but what about the copyright and intellectual property and all that carp for putting together this lot of resistors then? I recon they're worth a few hundred!
Is it similar to the trick of cheating the engine into thinking that air is too cold to pump more fuel in and theoretically get some more out?
V.
Lynall,
Little point in comparing on road diesel duty cycles with marine.
#1 High output marine diesel engines have benifit of sea water charge air cooling which gives you far greater pressure charging efficiency when compared with air to air CAC used in automotive applications.
#2 Marine diesel engines (RCD compliant) are very 'dirty' when compared with automotive applications. Gives you far more levers to pull when it comes to pulling reliable power from a given set of hardware.
If you look at Oxides of Nitrogen NOx RCD limit is 9.8 g/kWh Euro 5 automotive is 2.0 g/kWh......Euro 6 limit is 0.04 gramms!
RCD limit on particulates PM is 1.0 g/kWh, automotive Euro 5 is 0.02 g/kWh and Euro 6 is 0.01.
If you go after NOx you can release a heap more power from a diesel engine and because it is an oderless colourless gas who will find out, impossible to measure outside engine test cell, which is why EU is working away in background to ban chip tuning.
Thanks for that makes sense.
We no longer smoke test the euro 5 trucks for mot as they are so clean we cannot get the smoke tester to obtain a reading!
Lynall
This subject comes up time after time on this forum and every time I find myself having to convince non-believers. Remapping works and I've done it now on 4 different turbo diesel cars, including a Merc, 2 x BMWs and an Audi. It is really true that you can get more power and more torque and use less fuel (providing of course you maintain your previous driving style). Manufacturers have to set up their engines for lower grade fuel in other markets but of course we in Europe get high grade fuel. Also, manufacturers deliberately detune their engines for marketing reasons, either to fit neatly into a model range or to give themselves headroom for future engine upgrades. Remapping works particularly well with modern torque sensing auto boxes; the extra torque allows the gearbox to change up earlier which results in better fuel consumption. I have always used DMS http://www.dmsautomotive.com for my remaps. They are not the cheapest by any means but their claims for increased power, torque and fuel efficiency are realistic.I came to the conclusion that LR's boffins and testers knew vastly more than a snappily named company with a laptop and enough knowledge to be able to change the mapping in a chip. I had some experience with a company offering gas conversions, powerchips, ignition systems but learned that reality was a long way from the flashy claims that were made.
This subject comes up time after time on this forum and every time I find myself having to convince non-believers. Remapping works and I've done it now on 4 different turbo diesel cars, including a Merc, 2 x BMWs and an Audi. It is really true that you can get more power and more torque and use less fuel (providing of course you maintain your previous driving style). Manufacturers have to set up their engines for lower grade fuel in other markets but of course we in Europe get high grade fuel. Also, manufacturers deliberately detune their engines for marketing reasons, either to fit neatly into a model range or to give themselves headroom for future engine upgrades. Remapping works particularly well with modern torque sensing auto boxes; the extra torque allows the gearbox to change up earlier which results in better fuel consumption. I have always used DMS http://www.dmsautomotive.com for my remaps. They are not the cheapest by any means but their claims for increased power, torque and fuel efficiency are realistic.
As for manufacturers not doing it themselves, well they do. Several manufacturers have offered factory fit remapping as optional extras on their cars
Ok you have convinced me Mike , I want one but how do you get on when you tell your Insurers , do they load your premium by 15% or do you keep quiet and hope their engineers dont find it following a write off , I really wouldnt want to get convicted for driving without Insurance.![]()
You don't tell 'em. The kind of remap that DMS do doesn't even show up on dealer's diagnostic service equipment. They're not adding or changing any hardware on the vehicle, only modifying the software that controls the engineOk you have convinced me Mike , I want one but how do you get on when you tell your Insurers , do they load your premium by 15% or do you keep quiet and hope their engineers dont find it following a write off , I really wouldnt want to get convicted for driving without Insurance.![]()
You don't tell 'em. The kind of remap that DMS do doesn't even show up on dealer's diagnostic service equipment. They're not adding or changing any hardware on the vehicle, only modifying the software that controls the engine
Just a question when the engine is used for some car and boat(volvo D3),is the torque curve the same ?
You don't tell 'em. The kind of remap that DMS do doesn't even show up on dealer's diagnostic service equipment. They're not adding or changing any hardware on the vehicle, only modifying the software that controls the engine