AngusMcDoon
Well-Known Member
I agree that SM is the way to go for professionals and production, but don't think it is appropriate for this project at this stage where the intention is for anyone to get involved and be able to build up a system and get it working, for example would Tom Brewis have been able to cope with SM component fabrication, assuming someone had done a PCB and paid for its production?
All the through-hole components I have chosen are also available in SM versions if anyone wants to go that route, but until it is decided that the project is worth investing money in and getting PCBs made and populated, I think it is a good idea to stick with components that can be assembled on Veroboard or breadboard by people who may never have assembled an electronic circuit before. That's why YAPP projects have always used through hole.
This and all the other YAPP projects are open source. If anyone wants to layout one of them from the schematic onto a SM PCB, feel free to do so.
All the through-hole components I have chosen are also available in SM versions if anyone wants to go that route, but until it is decided that the project is worth investing money in and getting PCBs made and populated, I think it is a good idea to stick with components that can be assembled on Veroboard or breadboard by people who may never have assembled an electronic circuit before. That's why YAPP projects have always used through hole.
This and all the other YAPP projects are open source. If anyone wants to layout one of them from the schematic onto a SM PCB, feel free to do so.