Not a nice thing to say ??? Its a pity that a lot of your posts threatening all sorts retaliation has been removed isnt it .
(Not really. I only ever said what I would like to do. Not what I would do.)
BTW please explain how you quoted two crime incident numbers that were not reconised by the plod .
(Only one Crime Number as far as I recall and where did you get the bit about not being recog by the Cops ? It was the Number they gave ME)
Noticed you side stepped that when someone else asked . (If I did then I didnt see the post. Why would I do that ? )
You got to admit there are a lot of "inconsistancies" in your posts .
(Guess so. That was just the nature of it. Often could not post all I knew & still can't)
Who is the real Troll here ?? Your last two posts have made no sense at all.
...In previous posts you quoted two crime incidents logged with the local plod another poster contacted the plod quoting the log numbers YOU posted and they did not reconise them so I just asking why ????
Only one Crime Number as far as I recall and where did you get the bit about not being recog by the Cops ? It was the Number they gave ME
Another forumite said he had called the relevant police force and they did not recognise the incident number(s) you gave in your posts.
Sorry but on the original thread I did say the second number was how Hampshire Police record their incidents.
But did you not say they didnt reconise the number as a whole ?? just asking. ( cos there
are some hereabouts that consider asking questions to be trolling )
This is what I posted on the original thread and reading it again I suppose it could be read a number of ways.
"I spoke with Hampshire Police this morning and the 4411 number is how they record incidents for this year. They do not know the other number."
What I meant was...
The 0774684317 number was not recognised.
The incident number 44110358913 could well be genuine.
Sorry if there was any confusion.
Thanks Pete . Would be good if someone in the area asked the plod to varify the "reconised" number that would prove one way or the other whether this thread is genuine
Ps not suggesting you do it tho'
This is what I posted on the original thread and reading it again I suppose it could be read a number of ways.
"I spoke with Hampshire Police this morning and the 4411 number is how they record incidents for this year. They do not know the other number."
What I meant was...
The 0774684317 number was not recognised.
The incident number 44110358913 could well be genuine.
Sorry if there was any confusion.
Hmm looking at that number 077... quite obviously is a mobile number !!
so guess someone wrote the wrong number down in the post wonder who it connects to
the original thread had 49000 odd views cant help wondering if the number would get 49000 calls
Not enough numbers to be a mobile.
The other incident number given by Sandyman looked like a UK (44) landline number, but again with one digit missing. I queried this with Sandyman in the original thread but he didn't respond, just as he hasn't responded to my post above.
Shall we just let it drop?
Mulling over the fragments of detritus isn't getting anyone anywhere.