Binoculars

John 32i

Active member
Joined
5 Jul 2011
Messages
814
Location
Levington
Visit site
I have just bought a pair of Konus Tornado 7 x 50, waterproof, they float and have a compass, based on good reviews. Not used much as yet but initially they seem pretty good, although probably slightly heavier than I expected (problem with buying online!)
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
39,120
Location
Essex
Visit site
There's no substitute for trying them out yourself. How they feel, and the shape of the eyepieces plus the amount of eye relief can make a great difference to one's enjoyment of them.
 

seumask

Well-known member
Joined
5 Jul 2004
Messages
1,101
Location
Sussex-Hampshire coast
Visit site
Despite much fanfare about yachting binoculars being 7x50's I found i still use my very good birding Zeiss 10x42's a lot when sailing. They are waterproof and while a little harder to steady I've always enjoyed the higher power magnification, often at anchor or walking ashore to see whats going on, and what the birds are up to. I would agree that on a wet and windy night a pair of waterproof 7x50's would be better so I carry a cheap pair of those as well.
 

mjcoon

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jun 2011
Messages
4,453
Location
Berkshire, UK
www.mjcoon.plus.com
Despite much fanfare about yachting binoculars being 7x50's I found i still use my very good birding Zeiss 10x42's a lot when sailing. They are waterproof and while a little harder to steady I've always enjoyed the higher power magnification, often at anchor or walking ashore to see whats going on, and what the birds are up to. I would agree that on a wet and windy night a pair of waterproof 7x50's would be better so I carry a cheap pair of those as well.

For many years I have been carrying my birding binoculars on a short home-made pole (not a mono-pod) to assist holding them steady with hands well-separated. And I took the pole sailing too. Visible in this photo: Bins-on-pole.

Mike.
 

Skylark

Well-known member
Joined
4 Jun 2007
Messages
7,129
Location
Home: North West, Boat: The Clyde
Visit site
I was given a pair of 10x42 Swarovski in pretty tatty condition. I sent them to the factory for refurb, costing a bit less than £250. I thought that they had sent me a brand new pair in return, such was the quality of the refurb. They have absolutely amazing daylight to twilight vision and clarity.

Eyewateringly expensive to buy new but they are better than any others I've used, including Steiner.

They have the added benefit that you can pretend to be a Countryfile presenter or a rather well to do bird watcher :unsure:
 

Humblebee

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2001
Messages
1,697
Location
Muchalls
Visit site
There's no substitute for trying them out yourself. How they feel, and the shape of the eyepieces plus the amount of eye relief can make a great difference to one's enjoyment of them.

I agree with John. Our eyes are unique to us and what suits one person may not suit another. Try a few pairs before making up your mind.
 

[3889]

...
Joined
26 May 2003
Messages
4,141
Visit site
I'm in a similar situation to the OP andso far have narrowed my choice down to Bushnellsand Binolyt Searanger II. Any opinions on these? I have a pair of cheapo Plastimo which are functional but have a pretty dim image.
Luminosity is more important than weight, feel etc. I'm not going to fork out for Steiners so wonder if if I'll notice significant advantages in the £200 models. Is there a means of comparing image luminosity from manufacturers' data?
 

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,173
Visit site
I have a pair of these: Nautik-Fernglas BN 7x50 DCM | MINOX

They are great to use, light and everything I've wanted. I'll happily acknowledge that the Steiner bins are great but not great enough to make the difference in price, although I might one day be tempted to get a pair of Leica Noctivid 8x42s as they are fab.
I've got the Minox too, and would second the recommendation. I didn't think the Steiner were that much better either...
 

Praxinoscope

Well-known member
Joined
12 Mar 2018
Messages
5,790
Location
Aberaeron
Visit site
I agree with John. Our eyes are unique to us and what suits one person may not suit another. Try a few pairs before making up your mind.

I fully agree, try as many options as possible, but I would still stick with 7x50 for marine use, best performance in low light conditions being just one of the advantages.
Modern high index glass prisms and optics mean that modern 7x50's are smaller and more compact than the older traditional models.
 

crewman

Active member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
816
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
I'm in a similar situation to the OP andso far have narrowed my choice down to Bushnellsand Binolyt Searanger II. Any opinions on these? I have a pair of cheapo Plastimo which are functional but have a pretty dim image.
Luminosity is more important than weight, feel etc. I'm not going to fork out for Steiners so wonder if if I'll notice significant advantages in the £200 models. Is there a means of comparing image luminosity from manufacturers' data?
I have the Searanger III. I find them sharp and easy to hold steady. The compass is a good size and is easy to read. I would buy another pair if I lost them. They are fairly heavy.
 

DaiB

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2001
Messages
282
Visit site
My experience with Steiner and their warranty was not good. Personally I would not but anything from them again.
 

Frank Holden

Well-known member
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Messages
981
Location
Cruising in the Golfo Corcovado
Visit site
My boat bins are the Fujinon 7 x 50 FMTR-SX ..... not cheap... but as good as Zeiss for a lot less than Zeiss. They are rather big.....
For compact look at the Nikon 8x42 or 10 x 42 Monarch 5... I use the 10 x 42s afloat and ashore ... brilliant unless its dark and a heavy sea is running...
 

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,173
Visit site
My boat bins are the Fujinon 7 x 50 FMTR-SX ..... not cheap... but as good as Zeiss for a lot less than Zeiss. They are rather big.....
For compact look at the Nikon 8x42 or 10 x 42 Monarch 5... I use the 10 x 42s afloat and ashore ... brilliant unless its dark and a heavy sea is running...
I missed a pair of those Fujinons on Gumtree last year. £25, being sold by a charity shop. I begged them to take £100 from me but, commendably, they stood by the first buyer.
 

Kola

Member
Joined
4 Dec 2018
Messages
76
Visit site
Using a pair ofTalamex 7x50 Nitrogen filled, with lighted compass - Bak-4, find them quite good.
 
Top