shanemax
N/A
That way you know it dug in and didn't just sit there on its side looking prettyI found the 15kg Bruce on my old boat very reliable on 3:1. Only problem being it would be retrieved with half of Essex stuck to it.
That way you know it dug in and didn't just sit there on its side looking prettyI found the 15kg Bruce on my old boat very reliable on 3:1. Only problem being it would be retrieved with half of Essex stuck to it.
The tendency in scotland is all chain though, which would fit with the 3:1 scope.When I was a lad, back in Noah's day (1960s), 3:1 was regarded as the standard with more only if extreme weather was expected. On the West Coast of Scotland (where anchorages are often quite small), it's still fairly usual. Larger scopes, as well as the disadvantages you mention, can be anti-social in some situations. In a sheltered anchorage (and I wouldn't use any other kind), I'd only use more if a) I was expecting extreme weather and b) there was swinging room for a longer scope. Of course, that's 3:1 at high water; around the East coast that will be a lot more at low water.
My rode is all chain; I do have rope if I need more than about 55m, but I've never needed it. I think the chain must be 30 fathoms! But I'm good for any East Coast anchorage and most West Coast of Scotland ones.The tendency in scotland is all chain though, which would fit with the 3:1 scope.
Back in the '70s when we were keen we would often lie to two anchors, fore & aft, because that was what the books recommended. This was especially beneficial off Orford Quay and in the Butley. There were, if I remember, three ways of laying out the second anchor but the only one we used was to take the second anchor with its line out in the dinghy. I would like to have done the 'running moor' but the risk of anyone watching was always far too great.
There is of course the Notorious Pipeweed Problem in Hanford Water…
There is of course the Notorious Pipeweed Problem in Hanford Water…
Is there??????
It’s “notorious”.
It used to be a real issue, but less so in recent years.
(Forty years ago I was using a Danforth..)
I have anchored with a CQR against 6 knots of ebb in the entrance of the Ore. We had snuck in at dead low water (a few years ago, I believe it has shallowed since) but found we couldn't make reasonable headway once the river narrowed so dropped anchor for an hour or so.The fast flowing lowest reaches of the Deben and the Ore have shingle bottoms and nothing will hold against a strong ebb in that.
I have anchored with a CQR against 6 knots of ebb in the entrance of the Ore. We had snuck in at dead low water (a few years ago, I believe it has shallowed since) but found we couldn't make reasonable headway once the river narrowed so dropped anchor for an hour or so.
Just Googled Pipeweed and the only thing that came up repeatedly was Cannabis so perhaps you can educate me to its real name. cheersThere is of course the Notorious Pipeweed Problem in Hanford Water…
Just Googled Pipeweed and the only thing that came up repeatedly was Cannabis so perhaps you can educate me to its real name. cheers
Or a certain MP's action allegedly searching for "tractors"...That's a bit like when I googled images for Holly and was surprised at how many young ladies go by that name.
It's my story and I'm sticking to it.Or a certain MP's action allegedly searching for "tractors"...