Attempt by our Committee to change the Club rules without notifying the members

[NickC]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Ah - right - now we're down to what you want to happen - sorry if I've missed it - but that's the first time I've seen a "call to arms"

Well it’s not some ulterior motive, just one possible outcome. There are others:

• Maybe, considering the blatant flouting of Club Rules, the RYA will decide to intervene.
• Maybe another local club will intervene and persuade them to partake in some form of investigation & arbitration.
• Maybe someone on the forum will come up with a genius legal solution.
• Any other possibilities the collective intelligence of the forum might come up with.

 

[NickC]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

There were several long threads in addition to the current one, at least one of which may have been removed from view.

There were actually two threads which got suspended due to complaints by the Committee. I have copies of both but require permission from an Administrator to post them on here. Have emailed and awaiting their reply.

Alternatively pm me for the web link.

 

[Pete54]

Re: imposters on this thread

Pete, perhaps I could ask you the same questions as Ian.

Do you consider it acceptable to expel a member without any supporting evidence and then refuse to allow Ordinary Members a vote on the matter, blatantly ignoring the Club rules?

Do you think that those who fitted that oversized outboard engine and then issued threats should be thrown out of the Club?

How about those responsible for the theft of money from the mooring chain, should they be thrown out of the Club?

To answer you directly St NickC,

You are responsible for the behaviours you have experienced. If you were a normal balanced sensible person would any of this happened to you? No.

However because of your obsessive self-centred and egocentric behaviour you have ZERO support from the committee and ordinary members. So you seek to denigrate the individuals who lost patience and tolerance with you. Well the internet is a great place for doing that. Even the nuttiest, most lunatic individuals can find some kindred or sympathetic souls, one could be uncharitable and say lost souls.

You are never going to be allowed to re-join this club. You have completely alienated the committee and ordinary members. Your tilting at windmills most of which you in all likelihood created, does no more than illustrate your inability to understand the real world and what a ginormous pain you are.

Enjoy the rest of your life, create a club with a committee consisting of St NickC, ordinary member NickC and naturally rules compiled by NickC. that way lies true happiness - at least for NickC!

 

[steveeasy]

Re: imposters on this thread

To answer you directly St NickC,

You are responsible for the behaviours you have experienced. If you were a normal balanced sensible person would any of this happened to you? No.

However because of your obsessive self-centred and egocentric behaviour you have ZERO support from the committee and ordinary members. So you seek to denigrate the individuals who lost patience and tolerance with you. Well the internet is a great place for doing that. Even the nuttiest, most lunatic individuals can find some kindred or sympathetic souls, one could be uncharitable and say lost souls.

You are never going to be allowed to re-join this club. You have completely alienated the committee and ordinary members. Your tilting at windmills most of which you in all likelihood created, does no more than illustrate your inability to understand the real world and what a ginormous pain you are.

Enjoy the rest of your life, create a club with a committee consisting of St NickC, ordinary member NickC and naturally rules compiled by NickC. that way lies true happiness - at least for NickC!

Hi Pete,
you know that to be true then. I don't get why any rational person would spend any time writing what you have.

Steveeasy

 

[Poecheng]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

If we can generate enough interest on the forum then perhaps we can get enough (external) people to join the Club to force the Committee to allow a vote on the issue.

Sounds a great club to join. Just such a shame it is too far away for us otherwise we would be there like a shot.

 

[ghostlymoron]

I realise I'm only prolonging this thread but FFS!

 

[Daydream believer]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Well it’s not some ulterior motive, just one possible outcome. There are others:

• Maybe, considering the blatant flouting of Club Rules, the RYA will decide to intervene.
• Maybe another local club will intervene and persuade them to partake in some form of investigation & arbitration.
• Maybe someone on the forum will come up with a genius legal solution.
• Any other possibilities the collective intelligence of the forum might come up with.

Or better still you go away & take up something like horse riding. That sport needs a bloke like you:ambivalence:

 

[Daydream believer]

Re: imposters on this thread

To answer you directly St NickC,

You are responsible for the behaviours you have experienced. If you were a normal balanced sensible person would any of this happened to you? No.

However because of your obsessive self-centred and egocentric behaviour you have ZERO support from the committee and ordinary members. So you seek to denigrate the individuals who lost patience and tolerance with you. Well the internet is a great place for doing that. Even the nuttiest, most lunatic individuals can find some kindred or sympathetic souls, one could be uncharitable and say lost souls.

Yvou are never going to be allowed to re-join this club. You have completely alienated the committee and ordinary members. Your tilting at windmills most of which you in all likelihood created, does no more than illustrate your inability to understand the real world and what a ginormous pain you are.

Enjoy the rest of your life, create a club with a committee consisting of St NickC, ordinary member NickC and naturally rules compiled by NickC. that way lies true happiness - at least for NickC!

I think that to be a sensible observation. +1

 

[Seajet]

Re: imposters on this thread

See how this somehow links back to Her Majesty's Constabulary again.

Nick,

I think you've probably hit the nail on the head there...

 

[Resolution]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Or better still you go away & take up something like horse riding. That sport needs a bloke like you:ambivalence:

More like pig flying!

 

[WoodyP]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Re-arrange these words into a well known phrase or saying
life a get.

 

[rbmatthews]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Re-arrange these words into a well known phrase or saying
life a get.

Hmmmm.

Feel a git??

 

[WoodyP]

Re: Practical considerations on how to resolve

Hmmmm.

Feel a git??

Very good.

 

[NickC]

Re: imposters on this thread

To answer you directly St NickC,

You are responsible for the behaviours you have experienced. If you were a normal balanced sensible person would any of this happened to you? No.

However because of your obsessive self-centred and egocentric behaviour you have ZERO support from the committee and ordinary members. So you seek to denigrate the individuals who lost patience and tolerance with you. Well the internet is a great place for doing that. Even the nuttiest, most lunatic individuals can find some kindred or sympathetic souls, one could be uncharitable and say lost souls.

You are never going to be allowed to re-join this club. You have completely alienated the committee and ordinary members. Your tilting at windmills most of which you in all likelihood created, does no more than illustrate your inability to understand the real world and what a ginormous pain you are.

Enjoy the rest of your life, create a club with a committee consisting of St NickC, ordinary member NickC and naturally rules compiled by NickC. that way lies true happiness - at least for NickC!

Pete,

Have I done something to offend you, you seem awfully angry about something and irrationally negative about this thread.

Not sure about the St Nick moniker but glad you have recognised that of all those involved I am the only one who has not been devious or underhand and not lied to anyone. Thanks for pointing that out.

 

[NickC]

Earlier this year i met a committee member of the club & mentioned this forum thread.

DB, regarding that friend of yours on this Committee, who you know from your model boat club. It transpires that he is actually the very person who raised the proposed to expel me from the Club, were you aware of this?

DB, could we please have an answer from you, for the forum, regarding your possible links with the person who raised the proposal for expulsion in the first place.

 

[NickC]

To simplify the current issue for those who were not around when this saga started

According to Letter of expulsion from Club Committee the reason for my expulsion was:

“your actions towards the club via different forms of communications and public postings you have made, which have been seen as injurious to the good standing of the club”.
​

You will note, this does not specify any specific forum nor particular public postings. However the only two relevant forum threads from that time were the discussions on the Practical Boat Owner forum:

• Look what someone has gone and done to our (shared) Pandora
• When shared ownership goes wrong - Legal advice required

As those who read these and were on the forum at the time will attest, I did not make any derogatory remarks about the Club whatsoever, in fact quite the opposite.

Therefore the reason for my expulsion from the club is based on nothing more than a tissue of lies.

If anyone brought the Club into disrepute it was the two clowns who fitted the ridiculously oversized outboard engine and then tried to threaten me if I sailed my own boat.

 

[Daydream believer]

DB, could we please have an answer from you, for the forum, regarding your possible links with the person who raised the proposal for expulsion in the first place.

I do not see why i have to answer to you

 

[RichardS]

I do not see why i have to answer to you

Under my new proposals (aired and discussed in full in The Lounge), sustained refusal of a suspect under arrest to answer questions put to them by a Police Officer during the course of a fomal interview results in the burden of proof of guilt on the State transferring to become a burden of proof of innocence on the suspect.

In other words, it's a fair cop Guv! :encouragement:

Richard

 

[Daydream believer]

Under my new proposals (aired and discussed in full in The Lounge), sustained refusal of a suspect under arrest to answer questions put to them by a Police Officer during the course of a fomal interview results in the burden of proof of guilt on the State transferring to become a burden of proof of innocence on the suspect.

In other words, it's a fair cop Guv! :encouragement:

Richard

Rubbish. You really have no idea do you.

 

[RichardS]

Rubbish. You really have no idea do you.

And judging by the majority of posts on this thread, nor does anyone else!

Richard