alant
Well-Known Member
Alant, I'm happy to learn from you, and I know that your East/West formula has been long used, but I'm wondering if it is an added and unnecessary complication.
In astro navigation, there is no east or west longitude. All points are west of Greenwich. So if you are located on a map at 4 E. Then in actual fact you are at 356 W (in astro nav terms.) I believe that the E/W method that you mention is simply a method of turning map East into Astro West. Am I wrong here? I'm happy for your opinion.
Can't see why its an added complication, its the only straightforward way LHA can be found, as far as I know.
GHA, or even SHA, is always measured westward, from Greenwich in the case of GHA, in the case of SHA using 'the first point of aries, then adding the GHA of aries to give GHA of the star. Both derived from the exact time of the sight. However, your longitude is still measured as normal convention west & east from Greenwich.
Comparing GHA with longitude, gives LHA.
If your boat position is east of Greenwich & your heavenly body (Sun) is west of Greenwich, then the LHA is still the angle between the meridian the boat is on & the meridian the Sun is on, so (1) you have a measure of the angle from Greenwich to the Sun's position (GHA) (2) the angle from Greenwich to your boat (longitude east), which (3) are added together, to get the total angle (LHA).
LHA is the angular measurement of the distance between these 2 meridians & will be the same whether measured on the Earth, or on the Celestial Sphere. LHA doesn't have any west or east element.
Last edited:
