advanced angine - suitable for marine use ?

davidej

Well-known member
Joined
17 Nov 2004
Messages
6,533
Location
West Mersea. north Essex
Visit site
Opposed piston diesels have been around for years but with two crankshafts- one at either side of engine.

this concept is new to me and seems very clever but will mean a very wide engine
 

ALPHORA

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2005
Messages
64
Location
Scarborough
Visit site
The Napier Deltic engine seems to use the same idea for port timing and has been in use for many years. Nice cut away engine at the York Railway museum if you are into that sort of thing
 

Bilgediver

Well-known member
Joined
6 Jun 2001
Messages
8,076
Location
Scotland
Visit site
http://www.engineeringtv.com/video/Opposed-Piston-Opposed-Cylinder


Looks very clever. Multi-fuel; highly efficient about 40 %; selectable number of cylinders.

Any views ?


Oh well someone had to do it.....ANy one who was at sea more than a few weeks ago will recognise the similarity with the Doxford marine engine.:D

Yes here it is two opposed cylinders instead of cylinders in line however three cranks and con rods per cylinder. It will be interesting to see and hear the prototype run however the biggest problem will be emissions in this modern day world as timing by piston controlled ports is not exactly the must user friendly system for effecting variable timing. Mind you the MK 1 Doxford had a common rail fuel system and the mechanically controlled injector could be adjusted both in regard to opening timing and closing timing. Something not easily achieved again until recently .
 

trapezeartist

New member
Joined
4 Sep 2009
Messages
1,890
Location
Portishead
www.littlehotels.co.uk
If the claim proves to be true, the key point is the 40% efficiency. That is enough to make it worthwhile.

Like so many two stroke engines (petrol and diesel), it seems that the efforts to overcome the inherent problems of two stroke result in ever-increasing complexity. Thus negating one of the greatest advantages of a two stroke.

The wide, low, short box that the engine appears to fall into is both advantage and disadvantage. It looks like it should package really well into a commercial vehicle. It may also work in a mobo, but it is too wide for a yacht. Certainly any boat would have to be designed from the keel up to package the OPOC engine: it won't be a retrofit.
 

sarabande

Well-known member
Joined
6 May 2005
Messages
35,895
Visit site
what if you turn it through 90degrees so the long axis runs fore and aft ?


OK, it then needs a right angle gearbox...
 

CharlesSwallow

New member
Joined
3 Dec 2009
Messages
2,545
Location
E Mids, London & Greece
Visit site
"Boxer" engine

I always thought that such an engine is more appropriate to the term "Boxer" than that which currently holds the title since it's action is really like that of a boxer punching his gloves together before a bout.

However, leaving aside the semantics, I don't know how durable such a beastie would be. Those external con-rods look awfully vulnerable and difficult to keep stiff, lubricated and cooled. Dimensionally too, it is hardly ideal as a yacht motor.

The little internal combustion engines originally made to power torpedoes had a huge power to weight ratio but they were hardly durable - they didn't HAVE to be, after all as they were only required to make one short and sensational journey!

Chas
 
Last edited:

Plevier

Active member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
3,594
Location
Brighton
Visit site
If the claim proves to be true, the key point is the 40% efficiency. That is enough to make it worthwhile.

This claim surprises me. Experts on engine development that I work with at a university tell me that a - possibly the - major source of losses in rotary crank engines is piston ring to cylinder drag. That's why development efforts on hybrid vehicle range extender engines concentrate on 2 cylinder types (single cylinder being unacceptably rough). Doubling the number of pistons doesn't seem a good idea for efficiency in the light of that.

Reading the blurb below the video it seems the primary motivation behind the design is power density not fuel efficiency. That makes more sense on a DARPA development contract. Since when did the military worry about fuel efficiency?
 
Last edited:

dylanwinter

Active member
Joined
28 Mar 2005
Messages
12,967
Location
Buckingham
www.keepturningleft.co.uk
Oi

This claim surprises me. Experts on engine development that I work with at a university tell me that a - possibly the - major source of losses in rotary crank engines is piston ring to cylinder drag. That's why development efforts on hybrid vehicle range extender engines concentrate on 2 cylinder types (single cylinder being unacceptably rough).

Oi - unnaceptable the beast in the slug - volvo MD1

unnacceptably rough! The beast will be crying in the bilges

I accept it

D
 

30boat

N/A
Joined
26 Oct 2001
Messages
8,558
Location
Portugal
Visit site
The little internal combustion engines originally made to power torpedoes had a huge power to weight ratio but they were hardly durable - they didn't HAVE to be, after all as they were only required to make one short and sensational journey!

Chas

I thought torpedoes were propelled by compressed air motors?
 

Norman_E

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2005
Messages
24,551
Location
East Sussex.
Visit site
OK for the military in the US but over here 'Elfin Safety will have a fit when they see the exposed moving parts!

Given the service conditions of militaty vehicles I would think that the whole thing would have to be boxed in to avoid sand and grit getting into the bearings of the exposed parts.

I too thought that torpedos had compressed air engines.
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,444
Location
South Oxon, Littlehampton and Wellington, NZ.
Visit site
OK for the military in the US but over here 'Elfin Safety will have a fit when they see the exposed moving parts!

Given the service conditions of militaty vehicles I would think that the whole thing would have to be boxed in to avoid sand and grit getting into the bearings of the exposed parts.

I too thought that torpedos had compressed air engines.

Hi, Torpedoes have compressed GAS engines,not compressed air engines.Several submarine accidents have occurred when such an engine has started in the vessel,mostly fatal.
 

DownWest

Well-known member
Joined
25 Dec 2007
Messages
12,860
Location
S.W. France
Visit site
Wasn't the Kursk sunk by a Hydrogen Peroxide torpedo mishap?
These engines probably of more interest to MOBOs for economy reasons and low CofG. Yachtys are less concerned as fuel is not such a big factor.
Probably not cheap , but I like the electric assist turbo, presumable to get it started.

I remember a big buzz about ceramic engines, esp of interest to the military as they need less ( vunerable)radiator cooling. Any one heard something recently?
 

grumpygit

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2007
Messages
1,169
Location
Sailing the Aegean
Visit site
Just another reconfiguration of the Roots TS3 and the BMW diesel aero engine before that.

You are correct, Commer used the TS3 (TS4 was mothballed) for about 15 years in their heavy commercials. It all seems a touch of smoke and mirrors to me or akin to reinventing the wheel.......It's strange that Commer was under the Rootes flag which then went to Chrysler who must still hold patents and they are an American company. What goes round comes round I suppose.

Unless they do some neat tricks with the fuel management, emmissions and noise control, I would not entertain two stroke diesel in anything that I would own. They where smelly, smokey and very noisy and from what I remember not fuel efficent at all.


__________________________________________________________________________
 

SHUG

Active member
Joined
18 Dec 2010
Messages
1,318
Location
E Scotland
Visit site
Interesting engine but flat format doesn't lend itself for "low" installation in a boat.
An engine that I thought was perfect for the boat was the Steyr Puch engine which was widely used by the militart (Haflinger?)
I can't get a diagram but it had no cylinder gasket and was oil cooled= no corrosion.
The cylinder head and bores were all as one casting which bolted onto the crankcase.
 
Top