longjohnsilver
Well-known member
Penlee. Never forgotten.
+1Penlee. Never forgotten.
"Penlee lifeboat, Penlee lifeboat. This is Falmouth Coastguard. Over"
a
...
"Penlee lifeboat, Penlee lifeboat. This is Falmouth Coastguard. Over"
...
No words will ever be enough to recognise their outstanding bravery.
Lt Cdr Smith USN, the pilot of the rescue helicopter, later reported that:[12]
The greatest act of courage that I have ever seen, and am ever likely to see, was the penultimate courage and dedication shown by the Penlee [crew] when it manoeuvred back alongside the casualty in over 60 ft breakers and rescued four people shortly after the Penlee had been bashed on top of the casualty's hatch covers. They were truly the bravest eight men I've ever seen, who were also totally dedicated to upholding the highest standards of the RNLI.
Little reduces to tears that radio call is one"Penlee lifeboat, Penlee lifeboat. This is Falmouth Coastguard. Over"
a
...
"Penlee lifeboat, Penlee lifeboat. This is Falmouth Coastguard. Over"
...
No words will ever be enough to recognise their outstanding bravery.
Thanks for sharingThis thread inspired me to watch this again
Or alongside rocks. They probably spend as much time rescuing people cut off by the tide as they do errant yotties and broken ships.Makes sense for spending time alongside a ship
Worth watching the video above. They expected to get the engine going, probably reasonably as it was a new ship and they had multiple fuel tanks to switch between (they later found it was water in the fuel which stopped the engine), and the tug offer came early on before they'd been able to conclude it wasn't going to be possible. They drifted in towards shore faster than they realised (being pre-GPS) and by then was too shallow for the tug. The enquiry didn't find fault with them for that decision.The causes of the disaster are seriously angry-making:
"Near the south coast of Cornwall, 8 miles (13 km) east of the Wolf Rock, the new ship's engines failed.[1] The crew was unable to restart them but did not make a mayday call.[2] Assistance was offered by a tug, the Noord Holland, under the Lloyd's Open Form salvage contract but Morton initially refused the offer" - from the Wikipedia article
It crossed my mind at what point does bravery become recklessness, could a lifeboat coxswain ever be accused of trying too hard? There has to be a balance point, there certainly is when it comes to rescue helicopters who frequently refuse to try due to the conditions but i guess for them they could have a set max wind speed, then fairly easy to define a cut off point, more variables in the lifeboats decision.It would also be hard to argue with someone who stood the lifeboat down and refused to put more lives at risk after that, but I'd hate to have to live with myself after giving that order, and I suspect that the kind of person who volunteers to cox a lifeboat would likely have a sudden attack of radio failure if it were to be transmitted.
Or alongside rocks. They probably spend as much time rescuing people cut off by the tide as they do errant yotties and broken ships.
The causes of the disaster are seriously angry-making:
"Near the south coast of Cornwall, 8 miles (13 km) east of the Wolf Rock, the new ship's engines failed.[1] The crew was unable to restart them but did not make a mayday call.[2] Assistance was offered by a tug, the Noord Holland, under the Lloyd's Open Form salvage contract but Morton initially refused the offer" - from the Wikipedia article
I'm no fan of compulsion - you WILL be rescued, but that's an argument that's hard to refute in favour of it. It would also be hard to argue with someone who stood the lifeboat down and refused to put more lives at risk after that, but I'd hate to have to live with myself after giving that order, and I suspect that the kind of person who volunteers to cox a lifeboat would likely have a sudden attack of radio failure if it were to be transmitted.
Great info Bajansailor thanks.
I saw one of the Harwich pilot boats close up when they came into suffolk yacht harbour to refuel. When it left the berth it looked like it had not just a bow thruster but also side thrusters midships and stern. Do any of the lifeboats have that? Makes sense for spending time alongside a ship
It is heart breaking hearing about any loss, and around the Pentland Firth we have had a few.@Athomson - I think that many of the lifeboats in the RNLI fleet in the early 80's were still the relatively slow Watson type like (or similar to) the Solomon Brown - Watson-class lifeboat - Wikipedia
and including the Oakley and the Rother classes - Rother-class lifeboat - Wikipedia.
The Penlee lifeboat had two Gardner inboard diesel engines, 60 hp each, driving propellers in tunnels. Even in full astern mode, they would not have been very effective in trying to pull her away from the ship in distress, especially so when one considers the hurricane force conditions they were experiencing at the time.
The RNLI had already started to move towards faster offshore boats earlier with the Arun and the Waveney classes - even if the Solomon Brown had been one of these, she might still have not been able to get away from the casualty in the horrendous sea conditions that they experienced..
The program to replace the slow boats was probably accelerated as a result of Penlee, aided no doubt by increased donations,
The steel 47' Tyne class came on stream soon after, along with the Mersey a few years later.
And then the prototype (FAB 3) for the 17 metre Severn class was built in 1990 and she was a game changer - she had the ability to maintain 25 knots, even in fairly horrific conditions, thanks to a pair of 1,200 hp Caterpillar diesels driving her. Her power is 20 times the power of the Solomon Brown. The earlier Fast Afloat Boats (the Waveney and the Thames), along with the Tyne and the Mersey, were much faster at around 16 - 17 knots than the Watsons, but they did not have the sheer grunt power of the Severn and the 14 metre Trent.
The Tamar and Shannon classes followed, and all of these have been 25 knot boats - and I am sure that this is one of the main reasons for the dramatic improvement in the fatality rate, along with the huge advances in construction technology, machinery, navigation and safety equipment, training and everything else.