BurnitBlue
Well-Known Member
To answer your question why I still distrust bolt on keels to a GRP hull is because to me it seems very wrong to bolt under great torque a solid non-compressible iron keel to a GRP laminate which in itself is also non-compressible but crushable. The keel bolts only penetrate an inch or so which means that the compression in the keel is very small while the grp keel stub supplies virtually none and with very little elasticity to spring back ensuring tension over a long period of time.
Iron to iron seems OK to me. Wood is even better. It will compress ever so slightly so that the compression exerted by the bolts will be retained for many more years than the solidified jam of the GRP keel stub. It just seems wrong to me.
I would not be surprised if bolt on keels become a big issue in the next few years as more and more of the old ones start to fall off as the elasticity of the grp equalises and the keel becomes loose the detaches under stress. In fact I would say that it will only be the rust that will prevent the nuts from spinning off.
As you may have gathered I am not a mechanical or structural engineer. My field is electronics but as I will repeat it feels wrong.
Iron to iron seems OK to me. Wood is even better. It will compress ever so slightly so that the compression exerted by the bolts will be retained for many more years than the solidified jam of the GRP keel stub. It just seems wrong to me.
I would not be surprised if bolt on keels become a big issue in the next few years as more and more of the old ones start to fall off as the elasticity of the grp equalises and the keel becomes loose the detaches under stress. In fact I would say that it will only be the rust that will prevent the nuts from spinning off.
As you may have gathered I am not a mechanical or structural engineer. My field is electronics but as I will repeat it feels wrong.







