YM Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics

So the log shows 7.6knots, and the wind indicator shows about 6 degrees apparent wind angle. So its the iron topsail set then ;-)


Err, no. The 6 deg is on the control head of the autohelm. The wind angle is just out of shot. It is on the instruments that has 'wind' on it, bit of a give away!:D
 
Sorry Galadriel, couldn't resist being daft. :p

I always think of land as the yellow bits on charts, or as the thing that the boy in the crow's nest spots on the horizon. Not the mud underneath the keel. That's ground. Hence SOG (as you say) and COG, not SOL and COL.

Yes I should have put :rolleyes: at the end of my post. :D
 
It has failed to be adopted because it ignores a basic principle that people like to deal in whole numbers between 1 and 100. It's much easier to remember and visualise the difference between a 32ft boat and a 35ft boat than it is when the measurements are expressed as 9.8m and 10.7m. It's nothing to do with familiarity with the system; it's just the way our minds work.
On the continent measurements are normally given as 8m and 45cm or just "8m 45". For some reason in the UK we have chosen to use metres and millimetres which lumbers people with either decimals or uncomfortably large numbers.

You are converting and then blaming the metric system for forcing people to work with 'difficult' numbers. That's like advertising an RM1200 yacht (metric) as an RM39,37(imperial). In a truly metric system, yachts will be numbered in whole numbers.

Besides, for a long while now, a Bavaria 32 doesn't actually measure 32ft. Give me one yacht where the length is equal to its name.

Uncomfortably large numbers, like the BMW 735 or Merc 220?
 
metric

The UK has been metric since 1972 isnt about time we stopped all this dual measurement clap-trap. Is is very distracting & senseless

I agree with you weatherman. All the world except the usa which dont count use metric isnt it about time we forgot ft and ins and set a standard then there wouldnt be confusion
 
...It seems that YM were not even that accurate with the figures before they converted them! ...It's just a bit sloppy not to get the basics right. I enjoy the mag, so come on YM your readers deserve better.
I can't (and won't) comment on YM in general or this particular set of figures.
But I will say that when I was Technical Editor of MBY, we generally took the manufacturer's word for basic statistics. After all, if they don't know how long and wide their boat is, who does? And if we measured it with a tape measure and got a different answer, who would you believe? Who should we believe?
So when we were provided with a single set of figures, we laboriously converted them all. And we tried to remember to account for things like a gallon being smaller if the data came from the USA, or if it came from some yards in the far east. And we tried not to slip a line in the conversion tables. And we tried to decide whether the length over all really was "overall" or whether it arbitrarily missed bits off etc. etc.
But when we were provided with two sets of figures (imperial and metric) it's amazing how often they didn't agree with each other!
 
<snip>But when we were provided with two sets of figures (imperial and metric) it's amazing how often they didn't agree with each other!
And what did you do then? take an Average? Take one over the other? Publish both - even though they didn't agree?
Problem is - if you go back to the source you could either wait an age for someone to come back to you thus missing deadlines or, when they do give you an answer in time it could be just as wrong as the original stats!

LOA and Beam are easily measured, but keel & weight gets a bit trickier - unless someone pays for a lift - and then, what do you include? Bare weight, Weight of the vessel as delivered (with rig), sailing weight - tanks full/empty? So you're onto a looser if you decide to measure yourself too!
 
On the weight issue: In the harbour office we actually have a book with real-life weight for boats, as they are often somewhat heavier than the manufacturers figure - even when considering that they use the dry weight.

And what did you do then? take an Average? Take one over the other? Publish both - even though they didn't agree?
Problem is - if you go back to the source you could either wait an age for someone to come back to you thus missing deadlines or, when they do give you an answer in time it could be just as wrong as the original stats!

LOA and Beam are easily measured, but keel & weight gets a bit trickier - unless someone pays for a lift - and then, what do you include? Bare weight, Weight of the vessel as delivered (with rig), sailing weight - tanks full/empty? So you're onto a looser if you decide to measure yourself too!
 
horses for courses

I use both imperial and metric in large and small scales. If I say something is a bout 6 inches then its somewhere between 5 and 7 inches , not 152.4 mm to 4 sig. figs and I can usefully estimate a room size in feet, but not in mm, cm or even metres. Likewise about a metre doesn't imply the accuracy of 39.37 inches.

On a much smaller scale I can work in integers thousandths of an inch, without pretending their accuracy in microns.
 
I find imperial units are much better when being vague about measurements. Metric just has something clinical and precise about it, despite a mm being far bigger and more unwieldy than 1/64ths of an inch.
 
YM measurements

Perhaps they lost their sense of scale due to the tardis like dimensions of the aft cabin. ;)

Luxury I say!!

I grew up in a family of 5 who spent 2 weeks every year trying to complete a round trip from Inverkip to Ardnamurchan Point in a Kingfisher 20+ - just so we could tie a piece of heather to the pulpit. Happy days.:)

Boats under 40ft shouldn't have an aft cabin ... what nonsense!!

As for metric and imperial, the Americans, as well as spelling things incorrectly don't use the right pints or gallons either.
 
As for metric and imperial, the Americans, as well as spelling things incorrectly don't use the right pints or gallons either.

And that's really confusing, although I prefer an Imperial Pint when ordering beer. It is another good reason to standardize - whether it should be metric or not is another discussion, however as someone stated previously, it is widely in use :D
 
Its typical of this country, sitting on the fence, we are supposed to have a metric measurement systems, but road distances are still miles and yards!

The real question Galadriel is when does your boat appear in the small ads - cos that's usually what happens after a second hand boat test.:D
 
I am afraid I agree with this concept, although I am European I use sometimes inches when doing DIY to get an easier to remember approx size. No doubt the metric system is the easiest to work with when passing from lengths to volumes to weights: 1m=1/44millionth of an earth meridian, a cube with 10cm. side (or 1dm.). contains 1l. volume. 1l. of pure water weighs 1kg, etc.

I have been wondering however why European yacht builders use feet to define a yacht model. Perhaps a cunning plan to extend the model range and price. The same applies to marina berths charges. It would be better for the consumer if we had 10, 11, 12, 13 metres boats rather than 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 45, ... less space for producers and marinas to fiddle with prices.

The metric system is highly logical as you would expect from something French. Trouble is that the units are not particularly handy sized - and inch is much better than a cm for everyday use, just like a pint is better than a litre particularly for beer and milk. I find myself happily hopping backward and forward between metric and imperial.

The use of imperial for boats comes about because the first big leisure yacht building industry was in the UK. It will slowly change.
 
8 knots or even 7.5 close hauled?

Here are the polars for the Farr 40 http://www.blur.se/polar/farr40_polar.txt

That's what they can achieve sailed perfectly, usually by professionals at the top level. The fastest close hauled speed in the table is 7.33 knots at a TWA of 43.4 deg in 30 knots of true wind.

Do wave as you overtake, it'll make their day.

I do wonder about this sort of data in both directions. We have a similar 35 ft boat and see 7.5kn on the log when close reaching and the log is zeroed against the gps in the tideless area behind the barage. So it should be right. But at the same time, when I download the tracks from the Garmin after a race for analysis, the data never shows an average speed as high as the log indicates. Usually its got a 6 in front.

No disrespect to Galadriel but I'd never believe an owners figures anyway. But these days I dont believe the GPS either. And I dont believe those polars either but why they would print ones that are low, I do not know.

Funny old world.
 
No disrespect to Galadriel but I'd never believe an owners figures anyway. But these days I dont believe the GPS either. And I dont believe those polars either but why they would print ones that are low, I do not know.
Funny old world.

Our average speeds that I have quoted are from channel crossings, so a long enough period with a variety of conditions, averages over a period are far more meaningful. We start the time from when we hoist the main and stop the clock when we come along side in Northney. 6.6 knts in a 4 or 5 has been achieved on several occasions, not every time of course.
 
The metric system is highly logical as you would expect from something French. Trouble is that the units are not particularly handy sized - and inch is much better than a cm for everyday use, just like a pint is better than a litre particularly for beer and milk. I find myself happily hopping backward and forward between metric and imperial.

An awful lot of stuff in german is sold by the Pfund (pound, 500g) and Halbpfund (250g). Quote a few Zolle (inches) around as well, and 19mm seems strangley more popular than 20mm for drive shafts and the like

The use of imperial for boats comes about because the first big leisure yacht building industry was in the UK. It will slowly change.

I'm not sure. Hunter did metric boats (I have a 490) thirty years ago, and the later version of the Victoria 26 was the Victoria 800. People just keep regressing to imperial...
 
Just reading Ym test on one of those lovely Etap's but raised an eyebrow at the owners claims of easily obtaining 8 to 9 knots close hauled. This led me to the back of the artical for the favorite pastime of comparing boat spec's only to see YM at it again at their primary school attempts to convert metric to Imperial.

LOA 10.6m (31'6") - No it's not
LWL 8.7m (26'7") - No that's not right either
Beam 3.5m (11') - Maybe to the nearest foot
Draught 1.6m (6'3") - Way out
Displacement 6940Kg (8619lbs) - not even ballpark!

and if the diesel tank holds 11 Gal (105 ltr) how can the 22 Gal water tank hold 280 ltr?

This has completely ruined my game of top trumps and now I have no idea what is supposed to be right.

On their new 100 point results test I'd give them 1 mark for getting the make right. - Please try harder

Maybe they are related to anglers and maybe their swmbos really dont know what a 12 inches are !!:D
 
Top