Angele
Well-Known Member
He was still there at 2ish when we went in. Getting pulled off the mud by the Harbour Master.
... but had gone by 3pm (Monday) when I put to sea.
He was still there at 2ish when we went in. Getting pulled off the mud by the Harbour Master.
I accept my words may appear a little harsh....but!
The CG wanted a vessel to standby, not to assist at that stage. If you're downtide and under sail, get the engine on and work back up. If you haven't got an engine make this clear in your transmission. If someone is later better able to assist (as RIB Rio was) then you can be released from the scene at any time.
The key ethos behind my post is at sea, if someone's in distress and you're nearby the location, then (until you know other assistance is available) you are duty bound to assist in any way that you can without putting you, your crew or your vessel in danger.
"aground between the Needles and Hurst Channel"
Yes - I heard that, and one in Portsmouth Harbour "You've fouled your propellor on a mooring? Are you still made fast to the mooring?" and one at Langstone Entrance "Solent CG, this is Fishing Boat $SOMETHING, I can see the boat in trouble, my ETA is about 60 seconds".
CG seemed rather keen on lat/long and less keen on range & bearing - 'tho we've DSC*, I'll be paying a bit more attention to relative position WRT charted objects in future - if only to avoid possible comments from the peanut gallery.
* I must try a non-alarm "position send" to CG - 6am on a Wednesday morning is probably a good time for a radio check ;-)
I have been following this tittle tattle and now I am going to say a few words.
Now, I think, that instead of adopting the collective nit picking attitude so far displayed on this thread in the development of this discussion, would it not be more decent to offer consolation and give encouragement to sailors, and we don't even know how many, who have experienced the loss of a vessel and additionally the trauma of shipwreck, is my viewpoint.
None of you here were on board when this happened, nor was I for that matter.
The forum know best....and the forum doesn't let facts get in the way of a good finger pointing session![]()
. . . It reminds me of the Hillsborough disaster where the 999 operators were forced to keep asking for the postcode, despite it being bleeding obvious where the problem was. . . .
I doubt it. Hardly anyone had a mobile phone in 1989.In 1989, a very large number of people phoning about the Hillsborough tragedy were using mobile phones.
I doubt it. Hardly anyone had a mobile phone in 1989.
Beautifully put VO5 - I was thinking I would add something to this trail for a day or two but thought I would see how it developed and if any facts came out. None yet I see but I'll be interested to see when they do.
My sympathy is with the poor guy who lost his boat and no doubt had a pretty petrifying experience - none of us know how the boat got to that desperate position but the Needles channel in a F5/6 wind against tide (I assume it was) is bad enough and as you get close to the shingles the overfalls get worse. I imagine the boat was rising and falling 6 - 8 ft on every wave - no boat would survive for long.
Just a thought about racing boats pushing their luck with shoals - often true, but not the shingles. If you're in positive tide you want to stay in the middle and avoid the worst waves near the bank to keep boatspeed up. If in negative tide most likely you wouldn't take risks in any significant wind and may use the north channel or hug the Needles side.
Interesting to see the boat aground outside the Hamble - it's not unusual there. Inattention, engine failure, whatever but no comparison to what the shingles would have been like.
Varvassi, and it only annoys those cutting the corner on the RTIR.
Otherwise there's nothing shallow enough to embarrass a small boat south of the Shingles.