JumbleDuck
Well-Known Member
Well, I'm with Jerrytug, I am I also incapable of understanding how a Court/Tribunal can define her as an employee/worker and not as a disgruntled paying customer. She's possibly got good reasons for being disgruntled, I really don't know whether she has or hasn't but without seriously bending historically accepted definitions, she's clearly a paying punter and not an employee.
Nobody has claimed she was an employee.