T
timbartlett
Guest
Thank you to everyone who contributed to last month's WNS. In terms of your response, it was one of the most successful WNSs that we've ever had, generating over 20,000 words of replies. If we could have used them all it would have been more than enough to fill a book of 80-odd pages, or about half the total editorial content of a typical issue of Motor Boat and Yachting. Unfortunately, that ain't the way it works, and I somehow had to edit it all down to just over 1000 words. I hope I did you all justice in the few words I was able to keep. My apologies to those who didn't make it into print, and my special thanks to those who did.
Now, back to business as usual....
* The idea of WNS is to offer a nautical puzzle, which experienced skippers will (hopefully) find interesting or entertaining, from which the less experienced may be able to learn something, and from which we can all pick up ideas.
* The WNS skipper is a fictional character. Any resemblance to a real individual is purely accidental, except that he occasionally makes mistakes, and he is not able to make time run backwards. So having got into a situation, he can't get out of it by wishing that he had done something different.
* WNS is not a competition to see who can match some hidden but predetermined solution. Of course I have an answer in mind (you wouldn't like it if I gave you an impossible situation, would you?) But mine may not be the best or only answer.
* If you think I've missed something or given confusing information please ask for clarification.
* Attributed extracts from selected posts will appear in the March issue of MBY.
Now, back to business as usual....
* The idea of WNS is to offer a nautical puzzle, which experienced skippers will (hopefully) find interesting or entertaining, from which the less experienced may be able to learn something, and from which we can all pick up ideas.
* The WNS skipper is a fictional character. Any resemblance to a real individual is purely accidental, except that he occasionally makes mistakes, and he is not able to make time run backwards. So having got into a situation, he can't get out of it by wishing that he had done something different.
* WNS is not a competition to see who can match some hidden but predetermined solution. Of course I have an answer in mind (you wouldn't like it if I gave you an impossible situation, would you?) But mine may not be the best or only answer.
* If you think I've missed something or given confusing information please ask for clarification.
* Attributed extracts from selected posts will appear in the March issue of MBY.
Our hero has been out for the day in a mate's 24-foot Boston Whaler -- a fast, rigid open boat, with a canvas bimini casting welcome shade over the helm and front passenger seats. But as the two men headed back to the harbour, they saw a thick black wall of cloud rolling in from the west. By the time they reached the Fairway buoy, the wind had increased dramatically, whipping a stinging spray from the wave-tops, while huge, heavy raindrops hissing down into the sea, cutting the visibility to a few hundred yards. At reduced speed, they head on towards the harbour, uncomfortably aware that the thunder was no longer an occasional distant rumble, but was now a series of distinct cracks -- and that each crack was following so soon after the lightning that they were sure the storm was almost directly overhead.
The boat's mooring is little more than a mile away, and there's a marina even closer. But does it make sense to pick up a wet, steel chain, perfectly earthed in sea water, in the midst of an electrical storm? Or to venture amongst a mass of sailing yachts. Or would it be better to head back out to sea? What now skip....?