flyingscampi
Well-Known Member
Allow me to educate you.
http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html
QUOTE]
Ballast or no ballast, surely taking 8 adults and 3 children out on a lightweight like the MacGregor 26 is foolhardy to say the least?
Allow me to educate you.
http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html
QUOTE]
Ballast or no ballast, surely taking 8 adults and 3 children out on a lightweight like the MacGregor 26 is foolhardy to say the least?
Allow me to educate you.
http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html
Lot there to read but the key phrase is possibly...
"The boat's hybrid design uses a water tank on the bottom to provide stability. The tank should be filled when there are more than four people on board, MacGregor said. The tank on the boat driven July 4 by George Dean Martin was empty, according to the prosecutor in the case.
The boat has no visible warning about needing to fill the tank, said the driver's lawyer, Richard Rubin."
Looks like slightlydifferent circumstances in this case, as the "yachtsman" appears to have been alone, but the Mac 26 has a history of falling over.
Indeed. Given that they were down below and the boat was inverted, I guess it would have been difficult, even if they realised what was going on, to dive down (as they would have had to so) with all that positive buoyancy in order to get out of the cabin and up to the surface. Ironically, they may well have been down below because it was deemed safer, I suppose.So the kids were wearing LJs and drowned; the adults weren't and survived.
Discuss!
these boats should be banned
Are you going to round up the 30,000 or so that have been sold, or shall I....
30,000 i'm shocked, the problem appears to be when people are tired or forget, e.g. ballast, most boats will look after themselves, but this design is dangerousAre you going to round up the 30,000 or so that have been sold, or shall I....
I confess I looked quite hard at getting one of these, but it was plain its sailing performance would have just irritated me, and I spent some time watching one on Rutland Water beating to windward, and it was struggling with windage and leeway in a light breeze. I'm not sure it had its water ballast full, but I couldn't tell frankly. I just knew it was not for me for all sorts of reasons, but they have plenty of fans who sail them successfully I'm sure they have a place, sailed/motored properly.
Tim
RTFM
read the effin' manual
I am gobsmacked that clearly these things can in effect fail into a unsafe condition....
![]()
Sorry damn forum won't let upload pictures "invalid file" it says. Worked allright on the old s/w.
But them macs can go weel under engine if you need to get back before closing time.
Absolutely........why can't they have something like self-bailers (but permanently open) used in dinghies which would allow the ballast tanks to empty when used at speed but would fill up when the speed dropped again?these boats should be banned