which fishfinder has the best display ?

mainshiptom

mainshiptom

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 Jul 2002
Messages
3,402
Location
Faversham kent uk
Visit site
I am thinking of a new fishfinder since the old depth sounder has just died..

What should i get ? also I am not going to put the transducer through the hull but place in the bilge inside a bag or poll full of water !

Are the raymarine's the best ??
 
the best will depend on a lot of things but an adequate display (as oposed to say a 10inch CRT commercial colour one) is around the 5inch diagonal - 240x240 pixel - and it's the vertical pixel count that makes the difference.
The big issue is going to be transducer - and you cannot beat a high quality through hull according to all the american reports - skimmer/back of hull comes next (suffers some turbulance wherever mounted) and inside the hull close behind it (suffers power reduction which impact in salt or silty water adn at depth) . Note if your boat stays afloat the inside the hull can suffer significantly if any fouling grows on the outside where the 'ducer is mounted.
As the technology's move on I would expect Garmin to produce a high quality colour sounder based on their Blue Chart compatable colour chart plotters but right now the only other notable ones on the market are the Lowrance X series (I admit to having the 480x360 pixel (I think!) LCX-15MT and use it as both a plotter and sonar. There are 2 colour ones as well. The other advantage these units have is that you can record interesting features or ground onto smart media cards and then replay on a PC. If, like me, you have connected a GPS to the unit you simply place the cursor on a poinnt of interest in the comfort of your home and it tells you the GPS coordinates which it records with the sonar track as it goes along!
Hope this helps
 
I have an Eagle Strata which works very well with the skimmer type transducer attached to the inside of the hull with sealastic. Been in place nearly a year now without any problems.
 
Wow, that 's all far too technical for me - sounds expensive as well. No wonder I don't catch any fish!
If you want a fishfinder for fishing then you need a far better & costlier piece of kit than that required as a replacement depth sounder.
If you only want the latter then a 128 vert. pixel machine will be perfectly adequate IMHO.
I have had both Humminbird & Garmin instruments in the past and think that the Garmin has the better (clearer/larger) display for the same sort of money. I found for example, that I could read the numerals on the Garmin screen without needing my glasses.
Check out www.powerboat-reports.com and look at their fishfinder comparisons dated Oct.2002 . A Furuno LS6100 comes top with the Garmin 240 a close second . I'd buy the Furuno but it looks as if it may be too large.
 
Agree with whisper - Garmin 240 easy to read numbers and very clear display. Works great for me in depths of 200ft plus with good resolution of wrecks etc. I mounted transducer midships using epoxy supplied, but I know others who use silicone sealant and are happy. Silicone has higher vswr than epoxy so will not be as good, but probably good enough unless you use in v deep water. At least you can get it off if you do get a problem with turbulence . .
 
New Garmin - Sneak Peek

Checkout the garmin web site www.garmin.com

They have a sneak peek section showing their two new fish finders about to be released the 80 and the 320 , both look very good indeed.

yada yada..
 
Re: New Garmin - Sneak Peek

The Garmin 80 looks very good and is affordable for a xmas presi..

I will wait till its out unless some one knows where you can order one early on the web ??

And who is YADA ??

Thanks

tom
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top