Kelpie
Well-Known Member
Think there are a couple of flaws in that argument.
Firstly - you have to strip the old boat down to basically a bare hull - thats labour you hve to py for - and then pay charges to scrap all the material.
Then you have to refit new gear into spaces not designed to fit originally and perhaps modified by 30 years of keen owners.
Whilst you might get discounts on the gear, but you will probably have to have a bespoke fit out plan for every single boat meaning no economies of scale in production, and laborious fitting and running of wires - no just dropping a premade wiring loom in.
Compare that to Ben Jen Bav - it all rolls out of factories, machine made - identical and is screwed, glued together in the same way hundreds of times - labour is minimised
At the end of your process you get say a 30 year old hull to a 35 year old design with new fittings that due to the additional labour used probably costs the same ( if not more) than a modern equivalent. What will poeple buy?
Fair points all. You would need standardisation to allow new gear to fit easily. Removal of corroded old fittings, and deterioration of glassed in components, make the idea less appealing.
The prices paid by DIYers for spares seems outrageous, though. I made myself feel much better about how much I paid for my boat when I flicked through a price list for the spares- I reckon I got my hull for nothing at all, if you add up the value of everything else.