john_morris_uk
Well-Known Member
I have noticed in several threads and in various places that people measure how good a propellor and boat configuration is by how small an amount of prop-walk that occurs when the boat goes into astern. I wonder whether this makes complete sense - or at least whether its the whole story? Whilst I might agree that a huge amount or excessive prop-walk is a pain in the back side (if you'll pardon the pun?) I don't have any problem with a controlled and predictable moderate amount of prop walk on a boat. If anything I think it makes the boat easier to handle in tight spaces.
You can use prop-walk to help you turn or to put you neatly alongside a pontoon in a confined space (so long as you can choose which way round to face) and you can use it to turn the boat round in not much more that its own length. Of course having prop-walk means a boat will have a 'preferred side to' when coming alongside, but I have never found this a problem. So long as the prop-walk isn't too extreme, there are tricks to use when coming alongside the 'wrong way round'.
All in all, I wonder where this movement for minimum or no prop-walk comes from? For me, prop-walk is a friend and ally in boat handling. Any ideas why almost any amount of prop-walk seems to be despised by some?
You can use prop-walk to help you turn or to put you neatly alongside a pontoon in a confined space (so long as you can choose which way round to face) and you can use it to turn the boat round in not much more that its own length. Of course having prop-walk means a boat will have a 'preferred side to' when coming alongside, but I have never found this a problem. So long as the prop-walk isn't too extreme, there are tricks to use when coming alongside the 'wrong way round'.
All in all, I wonder where this movement for minimum or no prop-walk comes from? For me, prop-walk is a friend and ally in boat handling. Any ideas why almost any amount of prop-walk seems to be despised by some?