Incredible, I know that area as I have done safety boat duty at the end of his garden.
The Thames floods, it is a house that backs onto the river at just above water level and has no flood protection (lots do).
I think he failed in the due diligence part of the process, if it was "terrible" and "life ruining" then I should think the previous owners would not have stayed there for so many years.
Unless perhaps microbiologist/bankers do not come along all that often. A rare breed.
They are nice houses, if you like that sort of thing. They can fit a flood wall if they want, not too much money. Crazy.
Yes, I chuckled on this one whilst reading the newspaper of the person sitting next to me on the train! (Dont you hate peeps that do that!)
It all boils down to the searches and enquiries that should have been made by the solicitor before exchange. That is after all what you pay them for?
Now if the landing stage had fenders drooping down all the time, that would be grounds...
why live on the river if you are not going to use it in someway.
I am constantly amazed by folks moving out of the city into the country and then complaining about the mud and tractors.
We have our fair share in the village. Moans about the Church Bells, moans about the lack of street lamps, complaints about Cockerels, moans about farm smells.
I can't understand it. I moved out here embraced the countryside and all that came with it. Indeed that was the very reason I came out of that wilderness called London. As regards the beautiful unspoiled village of South Stoke I wouldn't alter a thing.
Yep complete with flooding garden and Sh*tt*ing Geese....![]()