AlanPound
Member
Re: Which One do you recommend?
Hi Alan,
I have been trying to follow the thread but cannot see which you set you recommend and what your experience has been.
Brendan
Well (sorry to be so vague...)
If you want something that looks like a regular tranny (got to be careful using that word these days...), and sounds very good for all normal radio use, but which will also do SSB etc - all the usual shortwave frequencies - the the Roberts is good (well, I like it) - it has fine audio quality, but has maybe an 8 hour battery life - ideally you need mains, or run an inverter from the house batteries.
The Sony I mentioned is also real neat, but very much smaller, a rather longer battery life, but has a tiny speaker, so the audio quality is not so great (certainly ok for speech broadcasts), but either unit will get MetFax equally well. I guess there are much cheaper units that may well do an equal job, but I have no first hand knowledge of those...
The Nasa, I do not know personally, although I do know not to get the HF3/M (you don't need it, and it is actually a disadvantage if you want to use any of the quite good Windows software like JVComm) - get the cheaper HF3...
...The correspondent above says it is a good unit (I am pleased to hear that - I want to believe in Nasa)... I would guess that its power consumption is pretty low, as it is designed for the job, and uses 12V directly, not silly little batteries. Also, you would typically panel-mount it, rather than have it stand-alone (so it will look the business).
I guess that the Nasa doesn't receive FM broadcasts like the other two I mentioned, but you probably have the usual automobile stereo for that anyway...
Hope that helps.
Alan
<hr width=100% size=1>
Hi Alan,
I have been trying to follow the thread but cannot see which you set you recommend and what your experience has been.
Brendan
Well (sorry to be so vague...)
If you want something that looks like a regular tranny (got to be careful using that word these days...), and sounds very good for all normal radio use, but which will also do SSB etc - all the usual shortwave frequencies - the the Roberts is good (well, I like it) - it has fine audio quality, but has maybe an 8 hour battery life - ideally you need mains, or run an inverter from the house batteries.
The Sony I mentioned is also real neat, but very much smaller, a rather longer battery life, but has a tiny speaker, so the audio quality is not so great (certainly ok for speech broadcasts), but either unit will get MetFax equally well. I guess there are much cheaper units that may well do an equal job, but I have no first hand knowledge of those...
The Nasa, I do not know personally, although I do know not to get the HF3/M (you don't need it, and it is actually a disadvantage if you want to use any of the quite good Windows software like JVComm) - get the cheaper HF3...
...The correspondent above says it is a good unit (I am pleased to hear that - I want to believe in Nasa)... I would guess that its power consumption is pretty low, as it is designed for the job, and uses 12V directly, not silly little batteries. Also, you would typically panel-mount it, rather than have it stand-alone (so it will look the business).
I guess that the Nasa doesn't receive FM broadcasts like the other two I mentioned, but you probably have the usual automobile stereo for that anyway...
Hope that helps.
Alan
<hr width=100% size=1>