Waypoints?

prv

Well-known member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
37,361
Location
Southampton
Visit site
I'm probably going to regret this, but what would "waypoints for the English Channel" consist of, and how does one use them?

When I want a waypoint, I choose a spot on the chart depending on where I'm going, and put that spot into the GPS. If I'm being exceptionally organised, I may put two or three future ones in as well, but not often.

Would this list be full of things like "four miles WNW of Barfleur: xxºyy.zz'N, xxºyy.zz'W", "five miles NE of Barfleur: xxºyy.zz'N, xxºyy.zz'W", etc? Seems rather a cumbersome way of doing things.

Pete
 

jerrytug

N/A
Joined
31 May 2006
Messages
3,775
Location
Lorient
Visit site
Waypoints from lists need checking for errors, by plotting them on a chart.
So why use a list? I have never understood the reasoning, maybe I'm missing something.
 
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
525
Location
Canberra
Visit site
WP's are a personal thing!
Anyone using one from a published list runs the risk of several other boats bearing down on that WP at the same time as you. Not a thing you want in fog.

.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.

Mike
 

prv

Well-known member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
37,361
Location
Southampton
Visit site
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.

I've been on a boat that did exactly that!

I disclaim all responsibility since I was down below making the tea at the time :)

This was the first boat I'd been on with an autopilot, and it had a Yeoman plotter as well (this is before video plotters were mainstream) - so as far as I was concerned it was all amazingly high-tech. The owner had clicked the Yeoman mouse over one of the big Solent channel markers on the chart, pressed another button or two, and said "there we go - now the boat will take us there". I was impressed.

An hour or so later, while making the aforementioned tea, I heard a shout on deck and looked up to see the owner frantically hauling the wheel over. The electrickery really had steered us right up to the big steel channel buoy - and despite the last-minute efforts, we hit it a glancing blow on the port bow. No serious damage, fortunately, but a big streak of red paint to show what had happened!

Pete
 

bluerm166

Well-known member
Joined
29 Sep 2009
Messages
1,044
Visit site
Actually my gps's have a bearing to mark box,an achieved bearing box and a distance to mark box,so I keep a watch on all three as I go along.So unless you are actually using a true autopilot there is no reason why you need to pass any nearer a buoy (a confirmable,namable waypoint) than the safe channel determines.
Using confirmable named waypoints means that the gps will not be full of meaningless stuff.
 

alant

Active member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
37,599
Location
UK - Solent region
Visit site
Anyone know of a source of way-points in computer readable form for the English channel area?

Thanks

Positions of "Lights, Buoys and Waypoints", are published in Reeds Almanac.
However, I would be guided by the above posts, before using them, since they do not indicate which headland they are hiding behind for example.
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
40,845
Location
Essex
Visit site
A disadvantage of using marks as waypoints can appear on plotters is that a waypoint at the position of a lit buoy, for instance, can make it hard to bring up the information about the buoy if required. Keying in waypoints in any quantity is a mugs game and anyone doing anything more complex than local sailing would be better off with a plotter, however basic.
 

bluerm166

Well-known member
Joined
29 Sep 2009
Messages
1,044
Visit site
To answer the OP's question :
If you will be using a handheld gps to carry the waypoints and you do not already have Seaclear then spending £29-50 with VisitMyHarbour will give you the electronic charts and will allow you to make a route in Seaclear that includes all the points you want within minutes.When you transfer the route to your gps it will separately install all the waypoints involved so you can use either the GOTO function for any point or follow the ROUTE.
 
Last edited:

lw395

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2007
Messages
41,951
Visit site
Waypoints from lists need checking for errors, by plotting them on a chart.
So why use a list? I have never understood the reasoning, maybe I'm missing something.

I think if you take someone else's waypoint list and check it, it's more likely to be right than checking your own.
The most common mistake is to be one degree out?
I like to have a few key WP's in an old handheld gps as back up.

Personally, I'm happy having exact WP's for things like buoys, then 'aiming to miss'.
It means the bearing to the WP is correct and can be checked with a compass.
But then I generally prefer to steer than program the autopilot.
 

jerrytug

N/A
Joined
31 May 2006
Messages
3,775
Location
Lorient
Visit site
I think if you take someone else's waypoint list and check it, it's more likely to be right than checking your own.
The most common mistake is to be one degree out?
I like to have a few key WP's in an old handheld gps as back up.

Personally, I'm happy having exact WP's for things like buoys, then 'aiming to miss'.
It means the bearing to the WP is correct and can be checked with a compass.
But then I generally prefer to steer than program the autopilot.

That's a very good point, about checking that your own mistakes are the correct mistakes!
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.

Somewhere in the North Sea I nearly ran down a few tons of steel buoy at night because the offset of the chart I was using from WGS84 was equal and opposite to the offset I had applied to miss it. SWMBO called down from her watch 'That buoy looks a bit close'.
 

theoldsalt

Active member
Joined
24 Nov 2010
Messages
2,113
Location
Bristol
Visit site
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.

Mike

What's wrong with setting the proximity alarm for the waypoints on the GPS or chart plotter - useful for those too distracted to watch "distance to waypoint".
 
Top