Mister Rhino
New member
Anyone know of a source of way-points in computer readable form for the English channel area?
Thanks
Thanks
WP's are a personal thing!
Anyone using one from a published list runs the risk of several other boats bearing down on that WP at the same time as you. Not a thing you want in fog.
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.
What sort of way points do you want?Anyone know of a source of way-points in computer readable form for the English channel area?
Anyone know of a source of way-points in computer readable form for the English channel area?
Thanks
Waypoints from lists need checking for errors, by plotting them on a chart.
So why use a list? I have never understood the reasoning, maybe I'm missing something.
Anyone know of a source of way-points in computer readable form for the English channel area?
Thanks
I think if you take someone else's waypoint list and check it, it's more likely to be right than checking your own.
The most common mistake is to be one degree out?
I like to have a few key WP's in an old handheld gps as back up.
Personally, I'm happy having exact WP's for things like buoys, then 'aiming to miss'.
It means the bearing to the WP is correct and can be checked with a compass.
But then I generally prefer to steer than program the autopilot.
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.
.. and a good reason not to use a channel marker or anything similar as a way-point either. If it's accurately plotted you could run straight into it, fog or no fog.
Mike