Waverley whoops!

Phoenix of Hamble

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 Aug 2003
Messages
20,966
Location
East Coast
mishapsandmemories.blogspot.com
The Waverley hit the pier at Yarmouth Sunday night.....

DJE came into the Kings Head all rather excited, declaring "by 'eck... the Waverley's just twatted the pier".... /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Had a peek this morning on the way out, and it doesn't look to have done too much damage to the pier..... but a good chunk missing off one of the piles, and quite bent railings on one corner
 
Once Nick reminded me, I did get a photograph though its not one of my best. Click on it for the large version where some of the damage is visible. Hope there's nothing structural, considering its just re-opened....



Rick
 
Dinnae think much o' a pier that cannae tak a wee dunt frae ra Waverley. Perhaps if they'd spent a wee bit more than £500,000 it would have stood up to the job. She must have wellied every pier on the Clyde at wan time or another, an the Gantocks, an ....

Any hoo here she is - must be on her way hame 'cos she's steaming up hill
IMG_0894.jpg
 
How unfortunate! Worth bearing in mind that Waverley is incredibly difficult to manoeuvre. Her paddles are apparently linked AND she has a single rudder. Basically she cannot do the kind of spin arounds that paddle powered ships/tugs could always do by putting one side ahead and the other astern.
 
No prop wash to help with the turn then .... /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif Suppose the boat yard that built her was expectant of a few rebuilds ...... /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
 
Not many piers on the Clyde that have not had a good spanking from the old gal...!!!! Also the seabed has not got off lightly, Sanda Island, Girvan Harbour, the Gantocks to name but a few!!!

Paul.
 
[ QUOTE ]
How unfortunate! Worth bearing in mind that Waverley is incredibly difficult to manoeuvre. Her paddles are apparently linked AND she has a single rudder. Basically she cannot do the kind of spin arounds that paddle powered ships/tugs could always do by putting one side ahead and the other astern.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes definately linked - by the crankshaft of the triple expansion engine! I'd love to see the size of differential and brakes used in the independent paddle model~ unless they had two engines of course <span style="color:orange"> </span> .
 
The tide would have helped if she had turned round and approached against the it. But she didn't, she came staight in down tide.
 
Waverley does have feathering paddles but that has nothing to do with disconnecting power but adjusting the angle the paddle floats enter the water for most efficiency. A bow rudder was added during a rebuild in recent years, apparently a bow thruster was ruled out due the the fact she normally manouevers at speed also due to her shallow draft compared with her length. Paddle steamers with independently driven paddles either had two separate engines (e.g. the paddle tug John H Amos) or were diesels such as Talisman and some Admiralty tugs. Bearing in mind she was built in 1949 Waverleys manouverability compared well with contemporary single screw merchant vessels and better than a sailing vessel but poorer than TSMVs such as Balmoral -HOWEVER problems seem to arise with cross winds rather than tides due to her shallow draft and high superstructure allowing her to be blown sideways at low speeds.
 
Top