NealB
Well-Known Member
Views on heat and vac-pads in \'osmosis\' treatments...
Like most of you, over the years I've read loads of articles, books and websites about hull blisters (their causes and treatments).
I'm very well aware of the ''ignore it...no boat has ever been lost due to blistering.....it's a cosmetic thing only"' school of thought, and can see lots of merit in it.
However, I'm interested in hearing views on commercial treatments.
eg
- are they too quick to condemn, and peel, saveable gel coats?
- are there cases where the use of localised heating has damaged the laminate?
- is the use of vacuum-pads a 'good thing'? Are there any downsides to their use?
All thoughts on this welcome, as I'm trying to decide whether to have a commercial treatment done on the motorboat.
Like most of you, over the years I've read loads of articles, books and websites about hull blisters (their causes and treatments).
I'm very well aware of the ''ignore it...no boat has ever been lost due to blistering.....it's a cosmetic thing only"' school of thought, and can see lots of merit in it.
However, I'm interested in hearing views on commercial treatments.
eg
- are they too quick to condemn, and peel, saveable gel coats?
- are there cases where the use of localised heating has damaged the laminate?
- is the use of vacuum-pads a 'good thing'? Are there any downsides to their use?
All thoughts on this welcome, as I'm trying to decide whether to have a commercial treatment done on the motorboat.