bob26
Well-Known Member
Agreed - I certainly never changed the angle of the prop shaft on mine - but the prop change made a big difference. If Castlemarine's theory is right then why?
My experience was also that a prop change made a difference on the same hull and shaft angle.
The Castlemarine explanation does allow that changes in pitch or diameter could also affect things. But I suspect there are more forces at work than the Castlemarine's explanation allows for. A prop does not operate in unconstricted water but is likely to influenced by the hull close above it - often a hull sloping upwards at the aft end. When a boat is travelling forward the prop wash is likely to exit relatively evenly into a greater expanse of water since the hull usually slopes upwards up behind it. In reverse the wash may be into the opposite: a constriction in the flow created by the hull.
If the flow from the top of the prop hits the slope of the hull sooner than that from the bottom of the prop this might well cause asymmetry in its effect. This assymmetry might even be greater with a prop shaft that was horizontal than with an angled shaft. The upper blades of the prop may also suck down air causing them to have less push or grip than those below. In an extreme situation a prop that was not fully submerged would act even more like a paddle.
Perhaps Albin Vega owners (with their celebrated propwalk) would care to comment. Their prop shafts look about as nearly horizontal as its possible to be in a smallish boat to me.
One thing is for sure in my experience. Prop walk can be an advantage as often as a disadvantage.