To collide or not collide - that is the question

You don't understand relative motion, do you?

Yes, do you? On a 5 degree course difference, with one boat going faster they would at some stage have either turned into the collision course (against Colregs) or been in the overtaking sector.
 
Unless you can sort out who is the overtaking vessel, the windward boat should give way. Simples. The idea that under the col regs nobody has right of way is getting out of hand!

+1 Funny thing is one of the boats will decide hes got right of way and keep going, at the end of the day if you have seen them you are unlikely to put yourself in a collision...

Sadly there seem to be those that knowing this snip-it abuse it...

Yes, do you? On a 5 degree course difference, with one boat going faster they would at some stage have either turned into the collision course (against Colregs) or been in the overtaking sector.

Or be VERY slowly been over taking and come over horizon, or come out of a fog patch or.... you can make up lots of scenarios..
 
Yes, do you? On a 5 degree course difference, with one boat going faster they would at some stage have either turned into the collision course (against Colregs) or been in the overtaking sector.

You are assuming that boat B has always been going faster than boat A. They might have both been doing exactly the same speed from the time they set off and boat B has only now adjusted his sail trim to eek another half a knot. It's perfectly possible that at no time has boat B been overtaking and that neither boat has done anything against the Colregs (so far).
 
I think col regs are just for men.

hidesbehindsofa-1.gif
 
The vessel which has the right of way is the one crewed by the least knowledgeable skipper/helmsman...

The stand on vessel is the biggest one...

The stand on vessel is the one where the singlehanded skipper is making tea or sleeping...

The give way vessel is the one least bothered about the informal 'race' which occurs whenever two yachts come within sight of each other...

The stand on vessel is the one least able to disengage/dodge the autopilot...

The give way vessel is the most expensive one...

The give way vessel is the plastic one...

&c.
 
The vessel which has the right of way is the one crewed by the least knowledgeable skipper/helmsman...

The stand on vessel is the biggest one...

The stand on vessel is the one where the singlehanded skipper is making tea or sleeping...

The give way vessel is the one least bothered about the informal 'race' which occurs whenever two yachts come within sight of each other...

The stand on vessel is the one least able to disengage/dodge the autopilot...

The give way vessel is the most expensive one...

The give way vessel is the plastic one...

&c.

Issac Asimov invented the "Three Laws of Robotics" and then wrote a whole raft of stories picking up the inconsistencies and flaws in them. Debating the Colregs seems to me a bit like that! :)
 
Yes but OP says that neither skipper is 'aware' of any speed difference, although boat B is 'actually' slightly faster.

This invalidates the whole scenario: either one boat is faster than t'other, or not. Both should be keeping better lookout, then they wouldnt have got in to this situation in the first place! At this point Colregs gives up, and says both boats have responsibility for collision avoidance.

If BOTH skippers are being b minded, then the answer is to sail parallel until one has cleared the other, accompanied by a 'suitable verbal exchange' as they do so....:mad: That at least is the Solent solution.
 
Yes, do you? On a 5 degree course difference, with one boat going faster they would at some stage have either turned into the collision course (against Colregs) or been in the overtaking sector.

Say there are two boats (A and B); open ocean out of sight of each other; both are at the exact same latitude; both steering North; both at exactly 5 kts. You agree that they will be travelling parallel to each other, yes?
Now if boat A comes over 5 degrees to steer 005º, and he maintains 5 kts, the northerly component of his advance is only 4.98 kts - he will fall behind B. In orderly to maintain the northerly advance of 5 kts, A would need to make 5.02 kts on his course - in this case he would slowly converge with B on a steady bearing on the beam. At no point would he ever have been in the stern sector, nor could colregs seen to be in effect when they were not in visual contact.
 
If I was boat B then I would make a course change to avoid a collision when it is obvious a collision is likely, enough so that the boat in front doesn't worry. Then I could get the second gin out. On the other hand the 'no such thing as right of way in Colregs' brigade can carry on and ram the boat. Then I'll get the third gin out.
 
It isn't. If you had a right of way, once you got it you could steer wherever you wanted and the other boat would have to accommodate you......

It is just a phrase that means different things in different circumstances, and the fact that it does not appear in the colregs seems to be the most widely known thing about colregs.
In racing, the RoW boat has often many more obligations than the stand on boat in colregs.

Outside my house is a road which is a 'right of way' that does not mean I can 'stand on' without regard to other traffic.
 
Yes but OP says that neither skipper is 'aware' of any speed difference, although boat B is 'actually' slightly faster.

This invalidates the whole scenario: either one boat is faster than t'other, or not. Both should be keeping better lookout, then they wouldnt have got in to this situation in the first place! At this point Colregs gives up, and says both boats have responsibility for collision avoidance.

If BOTH skippers are being b minded, then the answer is to sail parallel until one has cleared the other, accompanied by a 'suitable verbal exchange' as they do so....:mad: That at least is the Solent solution.

But which should alter course to achieve parallel courses?

It's clearly a windward boat situation, unless the leeward boat did indeed come up from astern.
That is the thing with colregs, compared to RRS, they are written with boats approaching from over the horizon in mind, you cannot turn to acquire 'rights' as you do in RRS.
In practice, only boats with autopilots steer so exactly to the compass for long enough periods for this issue to arise.
 
Say there are two boats (A and B); open ocean out of sight of each other; both are at the exact same latitude; both steering North; both at exactly 5 kts. You agree that they will be travelling parallel to each other, yes?
....

Only at the equator old chap, everywhere else, the course 'North' diverges from the South Pole and converges on the North Pole..... Sorry, pedantry is essential in a colregs thread...
Other than that I agree.
Bearing in mind that in the real 'open ocean' the boat I was sailing changed course by more than 5 degrees on every wave...
 
Sorry, pedantry is essential in a colregs thread...

This is completely off-topic (but I think we've done this question to death anyway) but I read the following in the letters page of New Scientist a few years ago.

The Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell has recently been made non-smoking. To prevent people smoking in the toilets a notice has be fixed to the inside of every toilet door that reads "This building has been designated a no smoking area". Some wag had crossed out the word "area" on all notices and replaced it with "volume". Now that's pedantry.
 
Top