macd
Well-Known Member
But it makes a difference which way you are travelling/facing. A 30° tilt benefits if its towards the sun but reduces input if the boat turns in the opposite direction. I, on my swinging mooring, have always had panels at a slight angle to shed water but accept that they will not be at the optimum angle. The position had partial shading at times but didn't seem to affect the overall output much.
Unless you have a motorised tilt/swivel system, or are continually adjusting them, you have to accept that a fixed position is a compromise but still produces valuable output.
+1 My preference is definitely the lazy one, but then I've just about room to have the excess of panels that requires and have made efforts to be thrifty in electrical consumption.
However there is perhaps a virtue in having a degree of adjustment, perhaps over-cumbersome for routine daily use but fine for longer periods. Otherwise, the user is bound to have to decide when he wants the panels most optimal: when under way, or when anchored...and bearing in mind that he'll spend a great deal more time parked than moving.
Downwind in the N hemisphere Trades, the choice is fairly easy: for under way the panels should slope down to port; opposite for parked at anchor. And opposite to both, obviously, S of the equator. Similar considerations might apply in deciding on which corner to site any sources of shade, particularly wind generators.
![WP_20160228_002[1].jpg WP_20160228_002[1].jpg](https://ybw-data.community.forum/attachments/12/12579-9e8b69b6054fc7149628a33b76098b51.jpg?hash=notptgVPxx)