zlod
Well-Known Member
I've been having a "discussion" with a mate who is sailing with me this weekend: hopefully to Watchet and we are having difficulty resolving the answer to the following question...
The Bristol Channel tidal stream atlas (NP258) shows a weaker tide (than in the central Britstol Channel) close to Watchet on the ebb (small tidal arrow). On the flood there is no tidal stream arrow close to Watchet. One point of view states that there is hence no tidal stream close inshore at Watchet on the flood. The other point of view states that the tidal stream is similar to that in the central Bristol Channel. Which view is more correct?
We're hoping to sail from Portishead to Watchet (if there is some wind) and are trying to work out what sailing we do once we get to the Watchet area: it would be embarassing to sail past at low water (after the ebb) and then not be able to make it in at high water (on the flood).
The Bristol Channel tidal stream atlas (NP258) shows a weaker tide (than in the central Britstol Channel) close to Watchet on the ebb (small tidal arrow). On the flood there is no tidal stream arrow close to Watchet. One point of view states that there is hence no tidal stream close inshore at Watchet on the flood. The other point of view states that the tidal stream is similar to that in the central Bristol Channel. Which view is more correct?
We're hoping to sail from Portishead to Watchet (if there is some wind) and are trying to work out what sailing we do once we get to the Watchet area: it would be embarassing to sail past at low water (after the ebb) and then not be able to make it in at high water (on the flood).