Threat to sailing on the Thames

Sturgess

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2010
Messages
32
Visit site
The Port of London (PLA) website has a notice about their proposed new Byelaws 2011:

“Notice is hereby given that the Port of London Authority intends to apply to the Secretary of State for Transport for confirmation of the Port of London Thames Byelaws made on 14 July 2011.

Any person wishing to make an objection to or representation about the confirmation of the byelaws may write to: Department for Transport, Maritime Commerce and Infrastructure, Zone 2/32, Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DR (alternatively by fax on 020 7944 2186 or by e-mail quoting reference PCP 5/1/17 and stating the grounds of objection or representation on or before 2 September 2011. Responses may be shared or made public.”


I believe these new Bylaws, as proposed by the PLA, will stop recreational sailors and Yacht Clubs from racing boats on the lower Thames and make any non-racing sailing on the Thames far more dangerous.

Clause 9 of the proposed Bylaws states that a person must not organise a boat race without the consent of the PLA harbourmaster. Clause 9 states this PLA Harbourmaster demands four weeks notice and receipt of a comprehensive risk assessment report prior to his possible consent.

The effect of the clause 9 as written will be to make weekend racing by recreational sailors and members of the various yacht clubs on the Thames uneconomic as no recreational sailor will be able to meet the expense or comply with the demands of the comprehensive risk assessment report requirement.

Clause 24,(a) states that a vessel must not cross the river “as to obstruct another vessel proceeding along the fairway”. While the PLA may believe all the vessels on the Thames are power driven and moving “along the fairway”, sailing boats using the wind for propulsion and involved in boat racing frequently need to cross the river Thames. Crossing the river using the wind is fundamental to boat racing. The PLA wish to make this activity “an offence”.

Clause 16.3 (d.ii) deals with speed limits on the Thames between Cherry Garden Pier and Margaretness. This clause allows the Harbourmaster to issue “permits” to various chosen vessels authorising them to travel up to “30 knots through, on or over the water”. I believe the chosen vessels will include non-emergency use of the Harbourmaster’s own launches, the Police and of course the large Thames Clipper catamarans. These vessels travelling at 30 knots create dangerous waves and are a safety risk for small sailing boats and their occupants. These vessels navigating at 30 knots around bends and between other vessels on the Thames are a danger to all slow moving wind driven sailing boats.

It would appear to any reasonable person the new bylaws have been written solely to benefit commercial users of large power vessels and the PLA itself. I believe recreational sailors and powerboat users on the lower Thames are to discriminated against or excluded from the river altogether.

As a recreational sailor I have chosen to write to the Secretary of State asking that the PLA bylaws 14 July 2011 be rejected.


Kim C Sturgess
This Precious Isle
 
Sorry Kim

Fair enough you do sailing, so do I. But all these proposed rules are to make the area a safer place.

How would you feel when a one man 6ft Sailing Dinghy tries to manouver against the tide going just above 3knots, whilst a big ferry with 100+ passengers is behind it?! Does the ferry have to slow down for the one man dinghy? Well, they do now, but why NOT make it a rule that the dinghy stops just 10 sec, and let the ferry pass?

I have been powerboating for the past 14 years, but I still do sailing every now and again, and always understand the frustrations which I may cause for powerboats which are designed to go at higher speed than me.

Asking for risk assessment and in fact expecting that races to be notified to PLA is "SPOT ON". In summber 2009 we were behind a group of sailing boats (we were on a powerboat) and they were so oblivious about the fact that in a channel they should at least let us manouver and let us go not to expect us to stay behind them at 3knots...

Different view, ey?! ;)
 
"Clause 9 of the proposed Bylaws states that a person must not organise a boat race without the consent of the PLA harbourmaster. Clause 9 states this PLA Harbourmaster demands four weeks notice and receipt of a comprehensive risk assessment report prior to his possible consent."


Pretty certain that any "organised" racing from any of our local sailing clubs has to be advised well in advance to Medway VTS.This is,one presumes,to avoid a major clash of traffic,such as the gas ship meeting some very resolute members of one club determined to thrash the living daylights out of the club about half a mile down the the river somewhere just off Sheerness.
 
Find somewhere else to sail. Simple. :D

Same goes for all the Rowers :o


I wish both rowing and sailing clubs were a little bit more considerate towards other river users. This is just a cultural issue which can only be changed by the clubs.

I have always tried to be careful when passing them, but some seem to be just so stubborn to move, that makes me feel he is not going away on purpose.

What is he really trying to tell me?!

They immidiately get argumentative and start accusing you of putting their safety in danger...

Do they really realise that a powerboat can't steer if it cruises below certain speed?! NO!
 
I really mean it though.

I have no interest in Sailing or Rowing people.

I'm happy to accommodate any of the above if they treat the River and other users with the same respect I do however, so will happily co-habit the Thames, but any who don't can frankly get stuffed.

I just request the same treatment as I offer, but sadly they don't seem to want to play ball.

Canoeists are excepted, almost all of them are good sports, and happy to fit in :D
 
Hi Kim,

Thanks for bringing this up. It is an important point that needs further discussion.

Have you managed to chat over your concerns with the PLA? The reason I ask is they may not be looking to make the changes in the way you have interpreted them. Comprehensive Risk Assessment" covers a multitude of sins and "4 weeks notice" can be interpreted in a number of ways. Perhaps each club could publish their racing programme at the beginning of the year and then have a generic risk assessment in place to cover racing on the tideway?

Regarding the speed limit we've covered this in many previous posts and its ridiculous that they impose a speed limit on everybody and then exempt the "problem" vessels - ie the Class V Commercial Passenger Vessels.

I am sure that the need for such legislation will be justified in the wake of the recent accidents but I would suggest that the changes you have raised here would not effectively address the failings noted in the recent accidents.

Can somebody perhaps spend some time producing some template text to send in as a response? Also how about an e-petition???

Chris
 
Top