petem
Well-Known Member
Great clip. Who would fund the changing of the lights? Got to cost a good £50k.
There's another clip here if you can't wait til 9pm:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03qq2p4
Anyone ever come across a "heated toilet seat with massage function" before?
Anyone ever come across a "heated toilet seat with massage function" before?
There's another clip here if you can't wait til 9pm:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03qq2p4
Anyone ever come across a "heated toilet seat with massage function" before?
Looks like a very interesting show.
Always good to watch and laugh at how the wealthy spend their <line-through>hard earned</line-through> <ahem>tax dodging</ahem> money. #imnotenvious
Once again seems like they're trying to tell a story that "rich people are lazy, irritating and ask for ridiculous things", e.g. picking out things like electric curtains and stating he "doesn't want to have to get out of bed to see the sunlight." Why do you need to tell your co-worker that on TV? Surely just say that they want electric curtains rather than something that implies laziness.
Ditto the "special heated toilet seat with massaging function", did the co-worker need telling that in such cringeworthy terms (the speaker didn't look comfortable saying it as he looks down and his speech drops) or was that said to get it on TV and continue the bad image?
If i was the client the thing i'd be most unhappy with are these little clips making me out as if i'm Jabba the Hutt.
I wonder if the client visit was really all that bad or if the client had PLENTY of positive things to say, and many of the points on the list were entirely pragmatic.
I get where you are coming from --
From previous experience dealing with media of all types and been " bitten" by seemingly poor editing or deliberate editing to portray a hidden agenda.
I have learnt that that its best to agree to go ahead (with the interview /film / article etc ) only and ONLY if they sign an agreement to pass full editorial control to to you .
So you have to do the final sign off before "it " in this case a film -------before it goes out .
If they don,t agree to these terms -then we decline any involvement .
not unreasonable of him to put a clause in regarding his portrayal.
The bit that drew real fire on YouTube seemed to be the charterer saying it was great to turn up with people asking "who's that?" Well, getting mistaken for George Clooney - even for a few seconds - can't be all bad.
I get where you are coming from --
From previous experience dealing with media of all types and been " bitten" by seemingly poor editing or deliberate editing to portray a hidden agenda.
I have learnt that that its best to agree to go ahead (with the interview /film / article etc ) only and ONLY if they sign an agreement to pass full editorial control to to you .
So you have to do the final sign off before "it " in this case a film -------before it goes out .
If they don,t agree to these terms -then we decline any involvement .
Six pages for a show that has not been on yet
getting mistaken for George Clooney - even for a few seconds - can't be all bad.