MapisM
Well-Known Member
Guilty as charged for having said clearly enough (rather than just implied!), that it's bleedin' obvious.It would be great if someone could expand on the reasons why a shaft drive would be better, rather than just implying its bleedin' obvious. If it was bleedin' obvious to the newbie, I would not have asked the question! Your patience is much appreciated, R.
Otoh, ahem, it is, for most folks with even the slightest boating experience.
Which you obviously have, after "many years of sailing" - though I guess that the "sans engine" should have given me a clue...
I could add other minor reasons on top of those that were already mentioned, but the basic one is philosophical, sort of.
Outdrives were invented, designed and built with one single goal in mind - i.e. making planing boats go faster.
To achieve that result, several tricky mechanical issues had to be addressed (power transmission through one angle variable on two axis, plus a second angle fixed but at 90°, all waterproofed, etc.).
And they were addressed, pretty effectively.
But it still remains a sophisticated mechanical component, which needs maintenance, and whose main advantage (efficiency at speed) is totally pointless on a displacement boat.
Btw, what simonfraser said re. "needing" outdrives if you want to take the ground is total nonsense.
A single engine, keel enclosed prop D boat, possibly with bilge keels, is perfect for that.
The only slightly better alternative in this respect is an outboard, as BruceK suggested - just because it eliminates also the risk of cluttering the sea water intake.