Snubber/bridle revisted

Mk II

P68_FGA1.jpg

Yep MK2 should work - perhaps with some of those D section stainless strips as well.

You have probably seen this pic before.

IMG_1231e_Small_zpsb318d102.jpg


It shows how we use the bridle.
The chain comes up from the anchor, through the bridle's chain hook and then "loops" back down (nearly to the sea bed) before rising back to the bow roller.
This actually gives the effect of a "chum" - using the weight of the chain.
The chain's catenary effectively starts under the water rather that at the bow roller.
 
The capstan itself, with a loop of rope around it.

Problem with that is that the windlass is used to let the chain out so that the strop/bridle can take the load.
Likewise, on retrieval, you need to use the windlass to recover the strop/bridle.
Well - thats what we would do anyway.
With a loop over the capstan, there is a risk of tangling the strop - or worse, it starts to wind round the capstan.
 
Yes I think it would, but there's no fixing point there strong enough to take the load.


I think the stem is the place to bring the line aboard, it could be then taken around the winch ( without taking a turn if the lead suits) and made off either port or starboard. This would both reduce the load on the cleat and avoid the large loading generated by the scheme in post 1
It seems more elegant and robust to try and use both cleats but I think it is unnecessary and probably counter productive.
Winches are tough things robustly fixed, to my mind it is the mechanism that must be looked after, not the fixing or drum.

You might leave the snubber long so it could be made off at a length to suit the conditions or even brought to a clear further back ( or taken through one cleat and made off to another) if the case suits.
 
Yep MK2 should work - perhaps with some of those D section stainless strips as well.
Positively +1. :encouragement:
With the side advantage that in Mk2 neither the snubber lines nor the chain can rub/pull the bow roller cheecks, possibly making some grinding noise.
I mean, the chain still passes through the bow roller of course, but with the snubber lines pulling from the fairleads, it just sits there, completely slack.
 
They work great for med bow lines as the angle is quite shallow. My concern with using them for a dual snubber is that the angle of lines from the rubbing strakes down to the anchor chain is much sharper, which means rubbing on the rubber section of hull rubbing strake.
I don't see that as an issue, because there's an inverse relationship between the angle of the snubber lines and their load.
I mean, when the chain just goes down vertically, by definition it's because there's no wind/current pushing the boat.
Therefore, even if in that situation also the snubber lines would go down almost vertically, their load (hence also rubbing action) is very low.
In strong wind or current, which is when the load on the snubber lines is much higher, their angle is bound to be much more similar to bow lines in med mooring.
 
We are using the Ultra chain grabber - https://www.ultramarine-anchors.com/chain-grab

"The Ultra Marine Chain Grab protects the windlass from constant chain pull, and is easily attachable to a loaded anchor chain, disengaging automatically from the chain upon retrieval."

So maybe a little bit of a faff to deploy, but disengaging (the important bit) doesn't sound like a problem.

It will be interesting to hear how easy this chain hook is to use.

When we had our 10mm chain, we used one of these chain hooks.

lifting_chain_Hooks_H_323_rigging.jpg



When we moved to the 12mm chain, we used this type.

6-8mm-mooring-device-anchor-chain-lock-gripper-stainless-steel-4039-p.jpg


Both are a bit of a faff to deploy.
But fairly easy to recover - they tend to fall off as the chain is recovered.
 
Isn't that defeating the whole point of taking load off the windlass? Having said that with stretchy nylon, there will be less shock involved.

I don't think it is the taking the load of the windlass per se.
I thought it is more that the windlass usually has a clutch which can slip when the chain is tugged.
The V4 and V5 windlasses certainly have a cone clutch - though, I think the V8 has a dog clutch which might be less likely to slip.
Do you know which one you have?
I suspect it will be a V6.
Mine is a V4 which I have upgraded to a V5
 
I don't think it is the taking the load of the windlass per se.
I thought it is more that the windlass usually has a clutch which can slip when the chain is tugged.
The V4 and V5 windlasses certainly have a cone clutch - though, I think the V8 has a dog clutch which might be less likely to slip.
Do you know which one you have?
I suspect it will be a V6.
Mine is a V4 which I have upgraded to a V5

Confused. We have a V6.
 
Confused. We have a V6.

Presumably you are confused about the clutch.

The smaller Lewmar windlasses have a cone clutch - you can see it in this pic -

IMG_0147Medium.jpg


the capstan screws the cone down onto the gypsy.
If you slacken the capstan, the chain will run out so it is only the clutch that is holding the boat on the anchor.
I wonder how many people don't know this?

Likewise, the gypsy cannot be used to recover the chain manually without the motor.
I believe that there are adaptors, though, that you can fit that will allow the gypsy to be turned with a handle manually but they are extra and I haven't seen one for a V6.
 
Problem with that is that the windlass is used to let the chain out so that the strop/bridle can take the load.
Likewise, on retrieval, you need to use the windlass to recover the strop/bridle.
Well - thats what we would do anyway.
With a loop over the capstan, there is a risk of tangling the strop - or worse, it starts to wind round the capstan.
No way. The loop around the capstan would just slide on the capstan. It would definitely work well. To deploy, place loop around capstan and pay out chain till chain is just slack. To retrieve, wind in chain (capstan won't pull rope; rope loop will just slide) and almost immediately the rope loop goes loose and can be removed. Definitely works.
 
Last edited:
Thanks H, but no. Confused why jfm would suggest using a loop of rope around the capstan as an alternative to a strong point on the stem head.
Because a capstan *is*a strong point and this method places no load on the winch gears. The capstan shaft bearings can easily take the side load in their stride- you don't jack up you car when you park it. No complexity of Y ropes etc.
 
Because a capstan *is*a strong point and this method places no load on the winch gears. The capstan shaft bearings can easily take the side load in their stride- you don't jack up you car when you park it. No complexity of Y ropes etc.

It's that simple? Great! Why doesn't everyone do this then?
 
The capstan shaft bearings can easily take the side load in their stride
Agreed, but I still would rather route the snubber line(s) through the fairleads rather than inside the bow roller cheecks.
Which in turn means that you can attach it to a cleat as well...
 
Top