Groot T
Well-Known Member
Is this the sailing equivalent of not slowing down when someone pulls out in front of you doing a slower speed? Or tail-gating when someone cuts you up / undertakes you?
idiot
You are demonstrating exactly what I am saying here.
Even if the boat didnt actually touch ( I posted a photo of Velas stainless bow rail with grey paint damage at the time) you think it is safe.
Can you see the shadow from the sail on the frigate ?
They just weren't that close. There are well accepted techniques for measuring distance on photographs. Try that.
Now if you'd a photo (even a photshopped one) of the nearest boat twisted around with its pulpit ripped off, the forestay fitting destroyed and the mast coming down and a scratch in the grey paint of the frigate then you might get a few bites.
As an educational process and to get something constructive here, can you please explain the well accepted techniques for measuring distances on photographs?
To my ignorant and uneducated view, the picture does appear to show the yacht very close to the ship. i appreciate that lenses can distort distances but would love to hear what the technical view of the photo is in terms of distances?
me too!
As an educational process and to get something constructive here, can you please explain the well accepted techniques for measuring distances on photographs?
Just basic trigonometry:
The first is to measue the size of known object on the frigate and yacht. The bigger the better to minimise the effect of errors in the measurements, so height of mast on the yacht and height of funnel or mast on the frigate would be good candidates. That way you can get relative distances of the two objects. By knowing the absolute distance from one to the photographer, you can work out the distance to each and distance between them.
Second technique requires knowledge of the camera. If you know the focal length and sensor size you can work out the field of view of the camera at a certain range (assuming the photo hasn't been cropped). Again take a known length on the object and use it to determine the field of view and you can work out the distance to it. Use the formula:
field of view/distance to object = focal length/sensor size.
Of course all measurements will have a certain degree of error so you'll have to calculate that uncertainty to qualify your result.
Time and time again I see raggies far closer to ships than stinkers.
Is this available online somewhere? I've had a look but I can't find owt on youtube.The verdict is hardly surprising. After seeing the AIS track video replay I am astonished he attempted a defence and didn't plead guilty. Any of us could make the odd poor decision from time to time in any facet of life , but failing to recognise our mistakes and not having the humility to put our hands up is the difference between men and boys. The financial costs are small compared to the loss of life that could have occurred.
Is this available online somewhere? I've had a look but I can't find owt on youtube.
p.s. bringing up those photos again does just smack of someone trying over hard to prove a point Pete.
Apart from different point of sail, different sail plan, different location, different angles of crossing, different relative positions, not in the area of concern, no moving prohibited zone, no broken down motorboat, not in a narrow channel, no pilot, no escort launch... though there is a sailing boat I see..The incident was almost identical to the Atalanta case...
Apart from different point of sail, different sail plan, different location, different angles of crossing, different relative positions, not in the area of concern, no moving prohibited zone, no broken down motorboat, not in a narrow channel, no pilot, no escort launch... though there is a sailing boat I see![]()
You missed the principal difference. This ship is painted in low visibility grey, not bright Orange! I think anyone could be excused crashing into a ship that goes out of its way to avoid being detected...![]()