cliffordpope
Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to denigrate the tremendous achievement of Michael Perham, but does anyone else feel a little uneasy that the expression "single-handed" has become a bit debased?
I know there was no physical contact between the boat and its escort, but according to the report in today's Telegraph they were in constant radio communication and took it in turns to keep watch. That's not really single-handed, is it?
Also other "single-handers" have had back up teams ashore radioing them advance notice of wind shifts etc, and calculating the most advantageous course for them. I know this is all a matter of definition - even Slocum had a little help from the sun and the magnetic north pole - but the line does now seem to be being pushed to the extremities of what could still be termed single-handed.
After all, Buzz Aldrin (or whichever one it was) walked single-handedly on the moon, but he did have a little bit of help from his team.
I know there was no physical contact between the boat and its escort, but according to the report in today's Telegraph they were in constant radio communication and took it in turns to keep watch. That's not really single-handed, is it?
Also other "single-handers" have had back up teams ashore radioing them advance notice of wind shifts etc, and calculating the most advantageous course for them. I know this is all a matter of definition - even Slocum had a little help from the sun and the magnetic north pole - but the line does now seem to be being pushed to the extremities of what could still be termed single-handed.
After all, Buzz Aldrin (or whichever one it was) walked single-handedly on the moon, but he did have a little bit of help from his team.