Sigma 362 or westerly storm 33

doris

Well-known member
Joined
19 Jun 2001
Messages
2,197
Location
London
Visit site
By the way I wasn't suggesting that the Storm would be better than the Sigma, rather pointing out potential shortcomings of both.
Having had three different Sigmas, the designs are brilliant. The 362 is perfect for short handed cruising/racing, I did loads of both. The only question hanging over any Sigma is that they were built to a price so check how well the boat has aged.
If all good I think the 362 is one of the best and most timeless choices around. Light years ahead of the Storm, which is a very different animal.
 

Lucky Duck

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
8,394
Visit site
Personally if looking for a boat to single or short hand I would be looking to avoid those with large masthead overlapping genoas
 

kacecar

Active member
Joined
29 Oct 2007
Messages
241
Location
UK
Visit site
I own a Sigma 362 and have never sailed a Storm so my view is probably biased.

The Sigma's heritage as a cruiser / racer comes through - mainly in good ways but perhaps the interior is built lighter than cruisers of the same age. I singlehand the Sigma regularly and, if I want to, can even short-tack up a river but would not choose do so without a good autohelm - tacking without an autohelm of some sort would be very difficult. Sail size isn't an issue - reef early, and if short tacking partially furl the foresail. The Sigma is quite a bit smaller inside than a modern 36 foot cruiser, due to the relatively low freeboard and narrow ends. However,there's adequate room for two couples for weeks. Anyone over six feet tall might find a lack of head room a problem - I'm 5foot 10 and it's fine. And if you ever tire of wheel steering and yearn for a tiller the conversion on the Sigma is very easy indeed.

Best of luck with whatever you choose.
 

Donside

Member
Joined
18 Jul 2017
Messages
50
Visit site
I looked at both in 2013, and chose the Sigma 362
Everything I ever wanted in a cruising yacht, Safe, fast, comfortable and very well built.
Ticks my boxes.
Been sailing her on the west coast every year since up till now mostly two up.
Happy to help further if you want.
 

KREW2

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Messages
4,990
Location
Dorset
Visit site
One is 36ft one is 33ft, makes them different animals.
It's amazing how much more room you get with only one extra foot in length. Three feet will make a hell of a difference.
If you want a bigger boat get the Sigma.
 

Koeketiene

Well-known member
Joined
24 Sep 2003
Messages
18,166
Location
Le Roussillon (South of France)
www.sailblogs.com
One is 36ft one is 33ft, makes them different animals.
It's amazing how much more room you get with only one extra foot in length. Three feet will make a hell of a difference.
If you want a bigger boat get the Sigma.

Isn't it just.
When I was boatshopping recently, I was looking in the 30-35 range.
Nearly bought a 32' (which the wife did not like at all) and ended up with a 36' boat (which she does approve of).
The difference in internal volume is staggering.
And the 36' can still be sailed singlehanded (which was the main reason for downsizing).
 

ithet

Well-known member
Joined
27 Mar 2009
Messages
1,493
Location
UK, Hamble
Visit site
A closer comparison to the Storm 33 would be a Moody 336. As the Sigma 362 can be considered a David Thomas designed Moody (built in same factory, to same standard using similar parts) all things being equal it would seem good value.

I have sailed a bit on a Storm 33 (including cross channel) and they sail comfortably like the heavy boat they are.
 
Top