Shakedown cruise on a P vessel, 17 years after

MapisM

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 Mar 2002
Messages
20,659
Visit site
Ok, actually it's not like I haven't cruised on a P boat for that long.
But it's since the very end of the previous century that I got used to single digit speeds on my own boat, and I'm now just beginning to get used again to my old habits of faster cruising.
And fwiw, the first impressions are as follows:

First of all, on the old subject of the comparison between D hulls and P hulls used at D speed, I can only reconfirm what I always said: forget the idea that a P boat can be as comfy as a D boat at slow speed (particularly if stabilized). This is quite simply not true. Yes, my new tub has no stabs and the old one, on top of a D hull, also had stabs. So, the comparison is obviously unfair. But it's not just a matter of rolling, it's also the difference between the way a D hull "cuts" through the waves vs. the "fighting" attitude of a P hull that makes a day and night difference. But this didn't come as a surprise to me.

The second (and somewhat worrying) consideration is that P hulls scream for speed.
I guess this can seem irrational, but during the first shakedown cruise I made a 40nm passage twice. One of them with a bit of waves, that sort of "forced" to go at P speed to self-stabilize the boat and make the journey shorter. And that's all well and good.
The second time I had a mirror like sea, which would have been perfectly comfortable at any speed. But what happened is that I started cruising at 8 kts or so as I was used to, and I got bored - a feeling I never experienced with the old tub, but don't ask me why. Then I increased to the borderline of SD speed for a while (around 10 kts), but the boat didn't like that. Eventually, I jumped on the plane at 15kts, then increased to 20 'cause the boat seemed happier with that, and after fiddling a bit with rpm and flaps I ended making most of the trip a tad under 2000rpm and at a whopping 26 knots (3 times what I got used to in the last 17 years!).
And even then, the hull seemed to say "is that all you can give me?"...
I resisted the temptation to increase the throttle further just because I had an image in mind of a vortex in the tank bottom... Thanks God for the mechanical engines with no real time fuel burn numbers! :eek:

Bottom line, my message to those who are thinking to buy a P boat with the idea that it's still possible to use it in an economical manner is, quite simply, forget it.
I know that some of you guys made longish passages at 10kts with P boats, and what I just said is after 4 days of P boat cruising, so I might reconsider all that, sooner or later.
But I have a funny feeling that all those years of slow cruising in the almost complete silence and rock solid feeling that only heavy D hulls can offer will make it pretty hard for me to accept the somewhat disappointing experience of slow speed with P hulls for much more than very short island hopping.

In other words, what I would suggest to the same folks to which the previous paragraph was addressed is as follows: if you really want to go for a P boat and you are thinking to use it often at D speed, do yourself a favour and do NOT try a proper D hull of similar size before.
Or if you already have an idea of the sort of cruising comfort of a 50' D boat and you wish something comparable in a P boat, don't look at anything less than 80 feet.
It is indeed that different.
 
Have you tried it at anchor yet? How does that compare?

For me, I'm happy with my D boat. Longer sea and coastal journeys take longer, yes. But then we get to explore the inland networks where a P boat would coke up and not be as comfortable.

Plus, I don't have to worry about weight. We all have a habit of slowly adding "stuff" to the boat to make it just that bit more comfortable and be able to have just the right thing for every eventuality. With a P boat, that results in gradually reduced speed as stuff is slowly added, increased fuel burn and constant wondering about why the boat isn't as fast as it used to be. I don't have that problem!

For now at least, I'm happy to endure / have the inconvenience of longer sea passages as the consequence of my choice.

Edited to add:
I also love how my round bilged hull is silent at anchor and when moored, even in choppy conditions.
OK so it rolls a bit in a beam sea, but you can't have everything can you?!
 
Last edited:
I can see how that makes sense on the boats you have used.

SD hull has suited very well for us over many years with the typical swell off the Atlantic west coast of Ireland, and on the vast inland Shannon loughs where it can vary from glass to percussive shallow thumping wave patterns, she's as happy and comfy at 5kt, 7kt, 16kt or 20kt. Our coastal D speed is 7kt @ 2gph and if in a hurry a very economical 16kt @ 10gph for P speeds. Anything between 8kt and 15kt makes no sense on our SD hull, just ploughing water.

In an F6 wind against tide on the Atlantic mouth of the mighty Shannon estuary one is glad of the sea keeping an SD hull provides. Max comfort speed is dictated by the wave length and depends if the sea and swell are both running in the same direction or crossing as is often the case.
 
Tee hee! Thanks MM for that candid post - was interesting to read:encouragement:. I agree, but I would add that after a while (many years) 20-26 knots also gets boring and the "scream for speed" is softer. So I have loved doing 100nm passages at 10 knots, but in a boat the complies with your penultimate sentence (+ fins) so the motion can compete with your Cantiere Azzurro memories, even if not as good as a 75 foot D boat
 
Have you tried it at anchor yet? How does that compare?
Yes I did, and I can make a fair comparison because the old tub (whose size is comparable to the DP, being just a couple of feet shorter) had fin stabs but not zero speed.
In a nutshell, the DP is definitely better at anchor - i.e. she rolls less.
Again, not a surprise, and definitely not a good enough reason to rule out a D boat.
If anything, just a reason to get STAR stabs, for anyone wishing to anchor in rough waters.
Not a priority for myself, also because both myself and swmbo find more annoying the genset noise than the sea motion.
Well, up to a point of course, but above that point I'd rather pull the hook and move elsewhere anyway.

Another difference, but this is due to both the hull shape and also the material, is the slapping noise on the hull when anchored, which in P boats is much more relevant and can be annoying when overnighting.
Actually, the DP is not too bad in this respect. Having tried for instance the very nice bow cabin in a 20m Ferretti of an esteemed forumite, I would say that my DP is a bit less noisy.
Maybe it has to see with the fact that all interiors are made of glassed wood, with no GRP liners anywhere.
But the old tub, with her almost 2 inches of wood planks and a very fine bow entry, was in a completely different league. Believe it or not, even with waves significant enough to actually make the boat pitch, you could hear ZERO slapping noise in the bow cabin!
 
SD hull has suited very well for us over many years...
Yep, I just mentioned D vs. P because it's easier to compare the two extremes of monohull design.
But of course, SD are a compromise which fits somewhere in between, a bit closer to D or P depending on each yard philosophy.
And I'm saying "compromise" with zero negative meaning, 'cause it's one that makes sense in many ways!
 
A nice little number I have started to look at and man maths compute is the ETA time to run to reach the destination .
It's inverse to L/hr speed

But the psychology of throttling back means more time helming - actual boating
Bit like sex :encouragement:
Once you have enough experience Mapish M @ P you will slow down .
You are in the puppy love phase at the mo @ 2000 rpm

As far a fuel burn goes tbh in the global annual spend and then the fraction on diesel or allocation , it does not really matter how fast you go if you have sufficient reserves of speed
E.g. My boat planes @ 18 knots but I have a near a 20 knot envelope on top of that .
We rarely go over 1650-1750 rpm 27 knots
I , am also looking @ load and EGT , --- cos I can

But recently "time to destination " -- trying to extend that bit
 
P

Concentrate on the fact its not made of wood.................There, that's better, isn't it! :D
Well, actually I'm not so sure that the potential future costs of extraordinary woodwork (like those BartW is considering at the moment, for instance) would have been much higher than some refitting jobs I had to make also on the DP... :ambivalence:
But that's B.O.A.T. life, as we all know! :D
 
I have loved doing 100nm passages at 10 knots, but in a boat the complies with your penultimate sentence (+ fins) so the motion can compete with your Cantiere Azzurro memories, even if not as good as a 75 foot D boat
Funny that you should mention it, 'cause it fits nicely with my first hand experience.
I didn't have the privilege yet to try Match (apropos, any chance to see you around S Sard this summer?), but in that ballpark I tried both BartW and MYAG beautiful vessels (both stabilized, as you know), and in both cases I had the impression that the cruising comfort was roughly comparable with my old tub.
Otoh, neither are as comfy and stable as Mr.P's ORY, for instance.
Boiling water to prepare pasta during an almost 80 hours non-stop delivery trip at the beginning of January is not something you would consider with many boats of comparable size...
 
Yep, I just mentioned D vs. P because it's easier to compare the two extremes of monohull design.
But of course, SD are a compromise which fits somewhere in between, a bit closer to D or P depending on each yard philosophy.
And I'm saying "compromise" with zero negative meaning, 'cause it's one that makes sense in many ways!

Sure I totally get that. The SD setup just happens to suit our current type of cruising and the areas we explore. Long term I suspect we will end up with a long range D type of vessel with most of the accommodation on one level.
 
I , am also looking @ load and EGT , --- cos I can
Yep, I'm actually happy to have mechanical engines in more ways than one, but that's a bit of information I'd love to have.
I don't think there's anything I can do for load (no ECU to pull the data from), but for EGT I discovered it's a relatively easy job to retrofit thermocouple pyrometers on each bank (2 x engine on my V8s) and connect them to some gauges on the dashboard.
That's already in the "to be evaluated" folder for next winter...
 
with most of the accommodation on one level.
That's a very good point!
My old tub was all on one level, which meant that from the saloon+galley you only had 3 steps down to the cabins area - period.
On the DP, aside from the steps down to the lower galley, I have a couple of steps up to the p/house, and then 6 down to the cabins.
Sure, inch for inch there's much more accommodation space - particularly for the guest cabins.
But going up and down all the time ain't a pleasure...
Oh, well. That's a way to stay fit, I suppose! :cool:
 
Ive also got a SD but more to the point, a shakedown cruise without photos has got to be a first:)
Would love to see her at sea....even a wake shot?
 
Ive also got a SD but more to the point, a shakedown cruise without photos has got to be a first:)
Would love to see her at sea....even a wake shot?
Actually I was a bit busy checking all sort of stuff onboard, so I took just a very few pics.
I do have a wakeshot though, but I'm afraid you have to click the link, 'cause I've yet to find a Photobucket replacement for embedding pics in a post. One thing I'm surely NOT going to do is accept the ransom of those crooks! :ambivalence:
 
...and don't forget the importance of this fact ;)

I mentioned on Bart's thread just now, have you officially left Venezia and enroute to CF, or still in shakedown mode?
Yup, being able to offer a more decent accommodation to guests was not the main goal, but definitely one relevant criteria in our search! :encouragement:
Still in shakedown mode, anyway. It looks like the delivery to CF will be further delayed, for a number of reasons.
I don't mind too much though, the summer is long down there...! :cool:
 
Yep, I'm actually happy to have mechanical engines in more ways than one, but that's a bit of information I'd love to have.
I don't think there's anything I can do for load (no ECU to pull the data from), but for EGT I discovered it's a relatively easy job to retrofit thermocouple pyrometers on each bank (2 x engine on my V8s) and connect them to some gauges on the dashboard.
That's already in the "to be evaluated" folder for next winter...
You could, I suppose, fit Maretron's fuel flow metering to each engine then have a Vas-style Raspberry Pi device that would compute/display load factor. I think that load factor is just injector opening time as a percentage of max opening time, but litres/hour as % of max litres per hour would be a good approximation. As you may recall I fitted these gizmos to both my gensets, and I can report that they work well but are questionable in terms of cost vs usefulness of course (easily cured by man-maths at the point of checkout, obviously).
 
But what happened is that I started cruising at 8 kts or so as I was used to, and I got bored - a feeling I never experienced with the old tub, but don't ask me why. Then I increased to the borderline of SD speed for a while (around 10 kts)
Yup I know that feeling very well. Very often I start out on long passages with every intention of doing the whole passage at D speed and after a couple of hours I get completely bored and put the pedal to the metal for the rest of the trip. Generally now I make a pact with myself, half the journey at 9 kts and half at 20kts. Yes that does make a significant difference to overall fuel consumption but I do wonder whether its all a false economy anyway because that fuel saving is being negated by the extra depreciation of the value of the boat due the increase in engine hours. One thing I have learnt is that if you are going to do D speeds, it has to be a proper D speed and not a SD speed. The fuel consumption of my boat rockets between 9 and 12kts so there is no point in doing 12kts to save fuel as you might as well be doing 20kts

I also agree that a P hull does not feel right at D speeds. I dont know what it is but maybe its as simple as being because a P boat is always lighter and does not have a real keel, a P boat at D speeds never feels really settled. Its a bit like driving a Porsche at 30mph; the car tells you all the time that it doesnt want to do that speed. Maybe stabs do make a difference to this feeling and I look forward to trying this out!
 

Other threads that may be of interest

Top