MoodySabre
Well-Known Member
I had my reservations but they were unfounded. 4lt/min is only a small amount compared to the output of a raw water pump.
Couple of suugestions. To fit a Volvo seal you can sleeve your existing tube out to 1 3/4" to take a standard 1" shaft size seal.
The PSS is a possibility and I know of another Sadler 34 that uses one, but I can't help but be swayed by all the hype over them. Still, my current thinking is I would rather the face seal than start messing around with my engine coolant.
So we have Radice and PSS that can both be vented without forced cooling.
Can anyone tell me the distance between stern tube and the bit of a PSS that sits on the shaft? Potentially if it is longer than my old seal I won't need to replace the shaft as it will sit on an unworn bit which would be a nice saving
Where in the UK can the Radice seals be bought from?
I don't think the VP seal is available with a connection for pressure feed or venting. It is probably the Radice seal you are thinking about in that case.Worth a mention that the VP seal can and often is used with an open vent or a pressure feed and then needs no burping or lube, the lube is only to help untill the water gets there properly on non vented aplications.
I don't think the VP seal is available with a connection for pressure feed or venting. It is probably the Radice seal you are thinking about in that case.
I have the Radice seal with venting. Only used it for one year, so has nothing special to report, but so far it is working well at least. Another improvement with the Radice seal over the VP seal is that it is easier to apply grease.
But I don't believe VP are making any such seal. See their broschure at http://www.volvopenta.com/SiteColle...Parts brochures/Rubber Stuffing Box (Eng).pdf . Radice on the other hand has "improved" the design a little with a feed/vent and grease hose. See their picture at http://www.elicheradice.com/imgsize...siale_RMTA_RMTO.jpg&w=500&h=450&constrain=yesNo I mean the VP seal, but perhaps I should have been a little clearer, the ones I have seen and the ones Beneteau and some other makers fit from new have the feed or vent at the top of the shaft tube rather than in the `seal itself.
My current stern tube has 2 dogs protruding outward that are supposed to engage with the stuffing box. Should these be cut off for fitting one of these other types of shaft seal? Sorry for the dum question.
But I don't believe VP are making any such seal. See their broschure at http://www.volvopenta.com/SiteColle...Parts brochures/Rubber Stuffing Box (Eng).pdf . Radice on the other hand has "improved" the design a little with a feed/vent and grease hose. See their picture at http://www.elicheradice.com/imgsize...siale_RMTA_RMTO.jpg&w=500&h=450&constrain=yes
So... Then the VP *seal* is not available as vented. Just as I said.The fact you don't believe it does not alter the facts, VP seals are fitted to new Bennys and others (have been for at least 6 years) and the vent is provided at the top of the prop tube, as I said it has nothing to do with the seal itself, the vent is tapped into the tube
I would have thought that the air vent needs to be at the highest point of the system otherwise some air will be trapped inside. As all? drive prop shafts rise towards the engine, the air is better vented from the seal itself rather than the stern tube. Agree though that a metal to metal connexion should be more robust.The fact you don't believe it does not alter the facts, VP seals are fitted to new Bennys and others (have been for at least 6 years) and the vent is provided at the top of the prop tube, as I said it has nothing to do with the seal itself, the vent is tapped into the tube and has nothing to do with the seal. got it ? Actually I think the ones in your photo have a potential to fail where the vent is joined to the rubber, the VP ones with the tap in the top end f the prop tube have less as they are a metal to metal joint.
I would have thought that the air vent needs to be at the highest point of the system otherwise some air will be trapped inside. As all? drive prop shafts rise towards the engine, the air is better vented from the seal itself rather than the stern tube. Agree though that a metal to metal connexion should be more robust.
Another thing I noticed on the VP website is that their seals are unsuitable for use with a flexible coupling. Does that include the R and D as that's what I've got.
I think the main advantage of the traditional stuffed gland is that it's unlikely to fail catastrophically. You can tighten the gland if you notice more leakage than usual and that will allow you to proceed to somewhere where you can do more maintenance. The Tides/PSS/VP seals can all fail in a serious way.
Seals that run around the shaft wear slowly and do not fail catastrophically.