Daydream believer
Well-Known Member
That's the great thing about this forum. We have essentially the same rig yet different opinions.
To each his own !!!
That's the great thing about this forum. We have essentially the same rig yet different opinions.
Talk to the Yardies who chock em up ashore, the hull skin is only there to keep the water out of the bedroom![]()
I have a Moody33 mk2 with a separate rear cabin accessed from the centre cockpit. It's ideal for two children, it has two berths but perhaps not for young children like yours. It was ideal for our two eldest grandchildren who started sailing with us when 9 & 11, they are now both working and said they wanted to go with us again this year but they are too busy doing their own thing...
I'll have the next pair next year(as long as I can persuade their mother to let them out of her sight!).
BUT I sailed on a 2001 Bav 34 a couple of weeks ago and to be honest I was impressed with it, roomy, nice inside with plenty of wood in sight, sailed well. This one had two singles in the saloon and a double in the stern and bows. The only down side was the genoa ripped on the way back, it was a bit windy at the time though!
I keep reading comments like that & just do not understand them . My AWB ( 2003 & not a twin wheeled jobbie & soon to be a MAB) is 31 ft & no way do i find it is any harder sailing to windward than some of the older designs I have sailed in the past. I certainly does not slam anything like people claim & it is certainly miles more drier than anything I have ever sailed before. It also performs well to windward & will leave many larger older boats behind
I think this slamming is a falacy created by MAB owners to justify their boat choice.
As for rounding up. I put first reef in 18kts in rough weather or 22kts in smooth water. It does not round up . It is stiff & if it heels too much I just ease the main a bit after I have flattened it first.
And a UFO34 or She 36 would have been even faster, and no less comfortable. But for ordinary family cruising 99.9% of the time the Jeanneau is the better boat. .
I disagree about the rig with big genoa. A small self tacking, or blade jib, with a big main is far easier to handle. I know because I sail single handed. The foresail is far more efficient if it is sailed fully out & not reefed. Modern mainsails with single line reefing properly set up are quick & easy to operate & can be done from the cockpit negating the need to go on deck which must be far better for a family crew.
A reefed main will set far more efficiently than a furled jib & can be handled by the helmsman - leaving the wife to tend to the kids ( or vice versa if not to upset the feminists!!!!!) & a self tacker needs no one except off wind which is no different to a larger sail. If it is rolled away then a nice big main will still drive the boat down wind.
I'm a little surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the four atributes of AWBs that the MAB owners tend to cite as drawbacks:
- skinny bolt on keels
- spade rudders
- saildrives
- shallow, wide, open transom cockpits
And on a personal note, I prefer a tiller to a wheel, which rules out the vast majority of AWBs.
The fact that nobody has raised these issues suggests that they are no longer seen as important. And makes me feel like a dinosaur because I still have reservations about them.
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 35 fin keel: first reef to windward at 12 knots in any seaway but you can just hold it unreefed to 16-18 knots by feathering/flattening/easing main in flat water and steady wind.
Saildrives have been in use continually for near 40 years which I guess is long enough to refer to as "old technology"
Apart from that I do not see any realistic advantages to the end user.
What about the lack of any need for alignment? Or the absence of a leaky sterngland? Or reduced vibration?
What about the aluminium alloy leg that is permanently immersed in salt water? Or the expense of regularly changing the anode? Or the unnoticeable ingress of sea water into the gearbox when a seal fails? Or the probability of worse damage (therefore expensive) should the prop foul submerged lines?
Things seem to have moved on. Did a windward passage across Poole bay from Hurst to Poole in my Bav 33. Wind over tide so a bit lumpy particularly off Christchurch Ledge. AW steady 20 knots with gusts. Full sail and making over 5 knots and no slamming or rounding up.
Think the slamming is very boat specific...
What about the aluminium alloy leg that is permanently immersed in salt water? Or the expense of regularly changing the anode? Or the unnoticeable ingress of sea water into the gearbox when a seal fails? Or the probability of worse damage (therefore expensive) should the prop foul submerged lines?
Alignment was a 'problem' back in the days of wooden hulls; with FRP and a disk-type flexible coupling (R&D) re-alignment in service has become largely a thing of the past.
A leaky stern gland? I use PTFE packing and, once bedded and adjusted properly there are no leaks. On the other hand, when the seal of a saildrive fails the water goes directly into the gear oil at the bottom of the leg... usually only noticed when a 'milkshake' drains out when changing the oil. No thanks!
As for vibration, that depends upon the rigidity of the bearers and the use of suitable silentbloc mounts. Having said that, every engine has a 'personal' range of RPM (some people refer to it as a 'sweet spot') in which it is not 'happy'; once out of this short range the vibration disappears.
As in most things, one pays one's money and makes one's choice.
I think this slamming is a falacy created by MAB owners to justify their boat choice.
.