seacock overkill, revisited

What will be your pension annually before tax (less state contribution)

  • £0 - £5000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £5000 - £10000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £10000 - £15000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £15000 - £20000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £20000 - £25000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £25000 - £30000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £30000 - £35000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • £35000 - £40000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • So much I cant count it

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
[ QUOTE ]
I think the problem you have is that you seem to be a chronic worrier finding risk in everything even though little experience with the matter, whereas I (and I suspect Cliff as well) come from backgrounds making use of these materials (and dare I say it, do not see potential disaster in everything).

[/ QUOTE ]Eloquently put young man. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
--------------------
hammer.thumb.gif
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity"
sailroom <span style="color:red">The place to auction your previously loved boatie bits</span>
 
I take it that the consensus, while not unanimous, is that I am unlikely to sink right away if I remembered to tighten the nuts /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Hopefully, for a while anyway, I will be better off than the many people now sailing around with rotten wooden bases between their seacocks and hulls, but time will tell. I myself have been shocked in the past when I removed ply bases, which looked fine with the seacock installed, only to find they were soft like wet biscuits under the seacock.

Sika's response to sarabande is interesting. I have no idea what the chemical composition of my boards are, but it will be educational to watch the long-term durability of Sikaflex (it was 291) in this environment. It certainly seems to adhere well, but again time will tell.

cheers
 
If you're curious about what the plastic is, there's a useful looking identification chart here. My money would be on the boards being High Density Polyethelene (HDPE). Anyway, PE or PP, I wouldn't give it a moment more thought. Either has got to be better than plywood.

(Oh, I did vote for option 4 above, though /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif)

Andy
 
[ QUOTE ]
(Oh, I did vote for option 4 above, though
/forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif)

Andy

[/ QUOTE ]Ther is always at least one........ /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
--------------------
hammer.thumb.gif
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity"
sailroom <span style="color:red">The place to auction your previously loved boatie bits</span>
 
I voted for the beer but was very disappointed to see that there was not associated with that option the need for a full risk analysis before partaking.

Especially as it is well proven that alcohol degrades both fibreglass and crew - in abundance making them very sika (research carried out at the University of Seven Saints, Utah by Prof. Sarah Band, any quick google will turn it up).

John
 
Top