[32511]
...
Mind you, one of my ancesters commissioned and commanded the largest ship in the world, at the time.
I think he was called Noah....
I think he was called Noah....
Captain Foster speaks well of his employers.!
However, not everyone did; I knew a man who told me that onecareer with Hains as an officer was to be able to box, which says something about the Jolly Jacks who shipped with them...[/QUOTE
I sailed as AB in the MV TREVAYLOR about 1963. I don't know about prior to the P&O take over but in my day Haines Steamship Company were known as 'Hungry Haines' some of the worst feeders out of London Docks. Board of Trade basic issue as per ships articles and the scale of issue was as per the Merchant Shipping Act of (I think 1894)!!
Five months in her, she was built in the 1940's and down by the head with cockroaches, even they were hungry I reckon..
IMHO good points about the fear thing. It hurts to say it - and damn them for it! but, from what I've seen, it appears that the average french yachtsman would be out there sailing, with nothing but a rough looking yacht, a partly working engine, in the cold and wet and still dry out on legs on the beach - much like the stories I hear of the UK 20 or 30 years ago. ....
Do you think our sailing forefathers had more bottle than us ?
i.e. no engines , gizmo's , weather reports etc
Or foolhardy ? Did being in a war influence things ?
Or are we naturally restrained because of today's pressures ?
I have a very interesting book at home - it's called "the last of the sailing coaster" and its the story of a man who shipped aboard the sailing trows of the Bristol channel.
Now thats the area I sail so I read the book with interest and was initially surporised at the places they got these boats, which were the HGVs of their day, without engines and usually with one man and a boy as crew.
The key turned out to be timing. They went when conditions were right for the journey. None of this "got to be back at work tomorrow" approach. If necessary, they waited a week for a favourable wind or tide combination.
Thats not to say that people didnt drown. But by dint of timing things well they took non engined unwieldy boats into places that I would think twice about under engine.
They also used a lot of techniques that we dont - for example drudging.
I never cease to be amazed that the public do not realise that the safety police are not there for the purpose of acting truly in the interest of the well being of the public. It is quite the opposite. They act contrary to the interests of the public. They encroach upon the public. They treat the public as if the public were children, with neither common sense or any sense at all for that matter. Of course the less the public actively resist such nonsense the more the other side feel emboldened to pass and enact increasingly arcane ideas. But the public, in very large measure is to blame, by resigning themselves to be subservient. And the public...remains mystified as to why these ideas are put forward and by whom. The answer is quite simple. The answer is that there is no interest in acting in the public interest at all. There is an interest in cynically pretending it is the case. The underlying reason being a well disguised objective, This objective includes dumbing down the population to make the population subservient, obedient and ultimately enslaved. This is in the hands of cynical planners who keep pushing the envelope using all sorts of excuses and silly reasons that do not stand up to intelligent scrutiny to bulldoze their way to impose their ideas and to succceed to have them implemented as law. The sooner everybody wakes up the better.
Perhaps it stems from being based in the solent for a while. Other areas of the Uk are perhaps a little more adventurous.